IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijaape/v10y2014i1p91-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditor workload compression and busy season portfolio changes: US evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis M. López
  • Marshall K. Pitman

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of auditor workload compression on the likelihood of changes to the busy season client portfolio of an audit firm. We find evidence of a positive association between workload compression and the likelihood of changes to the constituents of the busy season client portfolio of a local office. We also find evidence of a positive association between auditor-client misalignment and the likelihood of such changes. The results for our auditor risk proxies are consistent with prior studies, in support that auditors with greater levels of risk in their portfolios are more likely to engage in busy season client turnover. By using alternative research methods and considering previously overlooked variables, this study sheds new light on the factors influencing the portfolio management decisions of auditors.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis M. López & Marshall K. Pitman, 2014. "Auditor workload compression and busy season portfolio changes: US evidence," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 91-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:91-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=59191
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karen M. Y. Lai & Andriyawan Sasmita & Ferdinand A. Gul & Yee Boon Foo & Marion Hutchinson, 2018. "Busy Auditors, Ethical Behavior, and Discretionary Accruals Quality in Malaysia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1187-1198, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:91-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=41 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.