IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/afasfa/v9y2019i2p167-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock market behaviour: efficient or adaptive? Evidence from the Pakistan Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Naeem Shahid
  • Semei Coronado
  • Abdul Sattar

Abstract

The study empirically investigates the adaptive market hypothesis (AMH) in the Pakistan stock market over the period of 1992 to 2015. Daily data of returns (KSE-100) is divided into eight sub-samples of equal length of three years each and into different market conditions and are subjected to linear/nonlinear tests to elucidate how market-efficiency has behaved over time and whether a relationship exists between market conditions and levels of return predictability. The tests reveal that returns have gone through periods of dependence and independence over eight sub-samples thus Pakistan Stock Exchange is an adaptive market and consistent with the AMH. Furthermore, certain market conditions are more conducive to the predictability of returns as market conditions have also gone through episodes of significant dependence and independence of return predictability, which is also consistent with the AMH. Therefore, overall results of the study suggest that the AMH better elucidates the behaviour of stock returns than conventional efficient market hypothesis (EMH).

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Naeem Shahid & Semei Coronado & Abdul Sattar, 2019. "Stock market behaviour: efficient or adaptive? Evidence from the Pakistan Stock Exchange," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 167-192.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:167-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99488
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:167-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.