IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/idi/jiedee/v20y2014i2p102-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interrelaciones De Los Atributos Del Producto Y Las Preferencias Intransitivas / Relationship Between Product Attributes And Intransitive Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Veres, Zoltán

    (Escuela Superior de Estudios Económicos de Budapest (Hungary))

  • Platz, Petra

    (Universidad István Széchenyi (Hungary))

  • Tarján, Tamás

    (Escuela Superior de Estudios Económicos de Budapest (Hungary))

Abstract

Se suele pensar que las elecciones de los consumidores son racionales. Sin embargo, dichas elecciones son, en ocasiones, intransitivas. El presente estudio muestra un experimento sobre las preferencias intransitivas del consumidor, para el cual, con el fin de que se hicieran valer los aspectos subjetivos, desarrollamos un programa fundamentado en el método Q. En nuestra investigación experimental examinamos la manifestación de la intransitividad en las preferencias de los participantes, en casos de elección de productos simples, medianamente integrales e integrales. Con el método Q obtenemos un número igual de dimensiones de atributos de menor importancia (de nivel medio) para cada uno de los participantes. La tarea de los participantes es realizar una comparación por pares de preferencias entre cada una de las versiones específicas de grupos de productos. Por cuanto el análisis conjoint se fundamenta en la prueba y medición de las preferencias del consumidor, la reconsideración del fenómeno podría influir en la metodología de la investigación de mercados. Nuestra investigación se trata de la prueba de un modelo experimental que, con precisiones ulteriores, podría ser apto para medir con mayor exactitud las preferencias manifiestas. / Consumers are thought to be rational in their choices. But sometimes their choices comprise intransitivities. Current paper presents a mathematically supported experimental study of consumers’ intransitive preferences concerning product attributes. We used a personalized experimental design developed on the basis of Q methodology to maintain subjectivity. In our experimental study we are investigating intransitivity occurring in participants’ preferences during selection between simple, medium complex, and complex products. By the Q method we gain the same number of less important (middle level) attribute dimensions for all participants. The participants’ task is to make pairwise comparisons of preference between specific realizations of each product group. Since conjoint analysis is based on the measurement and testing of consumer preferences, reassessment of the phenomenon may have impact on marketing research methodology. This research is to test an experimental design which—with some adjustment—could be able to measure revealed preferences in a more precise way.

Suggested Citation

  • Veres, Zoltán & Platz, Petra & Tarján, Tamás, 2014. "Interrelaciones De Los Atributos Del Producto Y Las Preferencias Intransitivas / Relationship Between Product Attributes And Intransitive Preferences," Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE), Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM), vol. 20(2), pages 102-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:idi:jiedee:v:20:y:2014:i:2:p:102-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1135252314000069
    File Function: complete text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Atributos del producto; Evaluaciones/clasificaciones; Preferencias intransitivas; Product attributes; Rating/ranking; Intransitive preferences;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idi:jiedee:v:20:y:2014:i:2:p:102-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tony Crespo Franco (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aedem-virtual.com/es/journal/iedee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.