IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibl/journl/v1y2006i1p144-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive, Neutral, Negative Evaluation in Connotation

Author

Listed:
  • Åžaban Çepik

    (International Black Sea University)

Abstract

The article focuses on evaluation-type connotation, expressed by a theoretically triple opposition (positive neutral negative, as in plump+, stout neut, obese -) which is more often represented by only two members (as in dismiss neut fire -), though even cases with no opposition can be spoken about (e.g., bald -). Though to speak about connotative opposition we basically need denotative synonyms (like high-flown +?? "pompous" -), words like "warm" + and "cold" (especially in metaphoric meanings) may be viewed as both denotative and connotative antonyms. As evaluation depends on taste, it is subjective (depending on historic period, personality of the speaker, situational and linguistic context) and therefore difficult to study or teach. This situation, anyway, should not prevent researchers and language teachers from its careful treatment as ignorance of connotation on the language users' part may cause serious problems in communication

Suggested Citation

  • Åžaban Çepik, 2006. "Positive, Neutral, Negative Evaluation in Connotation," IBSU Scientific Journal, International Black Sea University, vol. 1(1), pages 144-147.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibl:journl:v:1:y:2006:i:1:p:144-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.ibsu.edu.ge/index.php/ibsusj/article/download/16/16
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibl:journl:v:1:y:2006:i:1:p:144-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Salavat Sayfullin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feibsge.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.