IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2026i2p192-200.html

AQI-Matrix Approach to Transforming External Inspection Results into an Audit Quality Risk Management System

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksii Haievskyi

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine)

Abstract

The inspection results compiled by public oversight bodies constitute substantial evidence of recurring deficiencies in quality management systems, audit engagement performance, and compliance with legal requirements. However, without an appropriate methodological interpretation, such results often remain statements of identified deficiencies and are not always translated into a coherent system of management responses within audit firms. The article aims to substantiate an AQI-matrix approach to transforming external quality inspection results into a system for managing audit quality risk management. The research methodology includes content analysis of academic and regulatory sources, comparative analysis of audit quality assessment approaches, classification analysis of external inspection findings, analytical generalization, and matrix modeling. The article proposes a logical sequence for transforming external inspection results into identified audit quality risks, grouping them by functional levels, assessing them through AQI components, and determining appropriate management responses. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the improvement of the organizational and methodological approach to managing audit quality risk management. Unlike approaches that treat external inspection results mainly as evidence of non-compliance, the proposed approach uses them as an empirical basis for developing an AQI risk matrix, ranking risks, and prioritizing audit firm management actions. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of applying the proposed approach to internal monitoring of quality management systems, planning staff training, revising audit methodology, and controlling the implementation of corrective actions. The AQI-matrix approach does not replace professional judgment and should not be interpreted as a rating mechanism for audit firms; rather, it is a tool for risk prioritization and continuous improvement of audit quality management. The proposed approach also provides a basis for linking external inspection findings with internal quality management responses, including methodology revision, targeted staff training, enhanced engagement monitoring, and control over corrective actions. This makes it possible to use external oversight results not as a final statement of deficiencies, but as an input for continuous improvement of the audit firm's quality management system.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksii Haievskyi, 2026. "AQI-Matrix Approach to Transforming External Inspection Results into an Audit Quality Risk Management System," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 192-200, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2026:i:2:p:192-200
    DOI: 10.33146/2518-1181-2026-2(112)-192-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afj.org.ua/storage/pdf/1248-2026-2-pub.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://afj.org.ua/en/article/1248
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-2(112)-192-200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2026:i:2:p:192-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhii Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.