IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2025i4p26-33.html

Participatory Budgeting as a Factor in Increasing Trust in Government and the Efficiency of Local Finances

Author

Listed:
  • Tetyana Vitovshchyk

    (Academy of Recreational Technologies and Law, Lutsk, Ukraine)

  • Svitlana Korzyk

    (Academy of Recreational Technologies and Law, Lutsk, Ukraine)

Abstract

Participatory budgeting is an effective tool for developing democracy, promoting transparency in public finance management, and enhancing accountability of government to citizens. Therefore, its implementation in Ukraine corresponds to modern trends in decentralisation of power and democratisation of society. The article aims to substantiate the implementation of successful foreign experience in participatory budgeting into Ukrainian practice as a tool for enhancing the efficiency of local finances in the context of decentralisation. The methodological basis of the study is a complex of systemic, analytical and empirical approaches that provide a comprehensive survey of participatory budgeting as a socio-economic and managerial phenomenon. The systemic approach in this study is fundamental, as the authors consider participatory budgeting a complex system that encompasses economic, social, legal, and managerial elements interconnected. The study's results show that modern models of participatory budgeting combine multilevelness, digitalisation and institutional stability. At the same time, the differences between them are due to the political system of the state, the level of development of local self-government, the degree of digitalisation, the behavioural characteristics of citizens, and the volume of financial resources. In Ukraine, the practice of participatory budgeting is at the stage of experimental implementation, and therefore, it requires adapting foreign models. An analysis of the experience of Latin American countries, the European Union and North America allowed us to identify the main areas of implementation of practical approaches in national practice. They include the institutionalisation of participatory budgeting, digitalisation, ensuring electronic participation in management, involving citizens in decision-making, compliance with budgetary fairness and funding priorities, performance assessment and monitoring, and utilisation of international cooperation and funding opportunities. Measures such as developing a legislative framework, integrating electronic platforms, introducing citizen training, and systematic monitoring of results can significantly enhance the efficiency of local finances and foster a culture of democratic governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetyana Vitovshchyk & Svitlana Korzyk, 2025. "Participatory Budgeting as a Factor in Increasing Trust in Government and the Efficiency of Local Finances," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 26-33, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2025:i:4:p:26-33
    DOI: 10.33146/2518-1181-2025-4(110)-26-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/1189-participatorne-byudzhetuvannya-yak-chinnik-pidvischennya-doviri-do-vladi-ta-efektivnosti-miscevih-finansiv.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/1189/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-4(110)-26-33?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H74 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Borrowing
    • J53 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Labor-Management Relations; Industrial Jurisprudence
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2025:i:4:p:26-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhii Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.