IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2025i3p21-30.html

Integrated Reporting as a Tool for Business Valuation under Concession Arrangements

Author

Listed:
  • Svitlana Korol

    (State University of Trade and Economy, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Concessions directly impact value creation for the private partner, the state, and society as a whole. Ensuring a balance of interests requires transparency throughout the entire period of a concession arrangement's implementation. In this context, concessionaire reporting may become one of the most effective tools for improving communication between government, business, and the public. This article aims to explore the theoretical foundations, regulatory framework, and practices of reporting on the implementation of concession arrangements as a basis for assessing value creation for the state, private partner, and society, and to justify the appropriateness of using an integrated reporting format for this purpose. General scientific and specific methods present the research methodology, including analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, identification of cause-and-effect relationships, systematization, and generalization. The article analyses the economic nature of concession as an instrument for value creation, existing reporting requirements for both grantors and concessionaires, examples of concessionaire reports from various countries, and financial and non-financial reporting capabilities. These elements are critically assessed within the given context. The research findings show that international financial reporting standards and sustainability disclosure standards introduced by the IFRS Foundation and the European Parliament do not adequately reflect a company's ability to fulfil long-term obligations under a concession arrangement. It is argued that integrated reporting is the most appropriate format for presenting information on the outcomes and future prospects of concession projects, as it covers financial, social, environmental, and governance aspects, allows assessment of the impact of concessions on all six capitals of a company, and demonstrates the concessionaire's actual ability to create value in the short, medium, and long term. This study fills a research gap in reporting on the implementation of concession arrangements from the perspective of value creation management. For the first time, it substantiates the relevance of integrated reporting for concessionaires as the most suitable approach to meeting the information needs of investors, the state, and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Svitlana Korol, 2025. "Integrated Reporting as a Tool for Business Valuation under Concession Arrangements," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 21-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2025:i:3:p:21-30
    DOI: 10.33146/2518-1181-2025-3(109)-21-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/1167-integrovana-zvitnist-yak-instrument-ocinki-vartosti-biznesu-v-umovah-koncesii.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/1167/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-3(109)-21-30?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graeme Hodge & Carsten Greve, 2021. "What can public administration scholars learn from the economics controversies in public-private partnerships?," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 219-235, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawson, Julie & Davies, Liam & Hayward, David & Troy, Laurence & Werner, Greta & Dodson, Jago, 2026. "Australia’s multi‑provider social housing system: contest or growth?," SocArXiv e6pyf_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Alper Aslantas & Irem Dikmen & Mustafa Talat Birgonul, 2025. "A Bayesian Belief Network Model for Assessing Financial Risk in PPP Healthcare Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Sebastian Zwalf, 2022. "Managing goal conflict. The case of agency theory in the policy settings for public–private partnerships; A perspective on citizen and government interests," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(4), pages 913-930, December.
    4. Mark A. Moore & Aidan R. Vining, 2023. "PPP performance evaluation: the social welfare goal, principal–agent theory and political economy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 267-299, June.
    5. Liying Zhang & Xuhong Su, 2025. "It is top-down governance: examining environmental public-private partnerships in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 28-49, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H81 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Governmental Loans; Loan Guarantees; Credits; Grants; Bailouts
    • L32 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Enterprises; Public-Private Enterprises
    • P11 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2025:i:3:p:21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhii Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.