Author
Listed:
- Rahmat Novari
(Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia)
- Yusnaini
(Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia)
- Luk Luk Fuadah
(Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia)
Abstract
In Indonesia, as in other countries, according to the requirements of the tax authorities, there is a need for reconciliation to match accounting profit and fiscal profit. Some rules are allowed in accounting standards but not in taxation. In reducing losses, the company must provide evidence of transparent financial statements that prioritize conservatism. Accounting conservatism is a set of bookkeeping guidelines that call for a high degree of verification before a company can make a legal claim to any profit. The general concept is to factor in the worst-case scenario of a firm's financial future. The authors of this study attempt to assess the level of accounting conservatism based on several factors, namely through tax incentives, political costs, litigation risk, and equity valuation The purpose of this study is the analysis of the impact of tax incentives, political costs, litigation risk, and equity valuation on accounting conservatism. The secondary data used in this study are financial reports and annual reports published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX, www.idx.co.id) for 2015-2020. The sample of this study is manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Based on the criteria that have been determined using the purposive sampling method, there are 23 manufacturing companies. The results show that tax incentives and equity valuation have a positive and significant effect on accounting conservatism in manufacturing sector companies in Indonesia. Instead, factors such as political costs and litigation risk negatively affect accounting conservatism.
Suggested Citation
Rahmat Novari & Yusnaini & Luk Luk Fuadah, 2021.
"The Impact of Tax Incentives, Political Costs, Litigation Risk and Equity Valuation on Accounting Conservatism,"
Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 39-45, December.
Handle:
RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2021:i:4:p:39-45
DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2021-4(94)-39-45
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:uii:jaaife:v:19:y:2015:i:2:p:85-98 is not listed on IDEAS
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2021:i:4:p:39-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.