IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2021i3p39-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budgetary Financing of the Environmental Protection Sphere in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Viktor Babichenko

    (Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine)

  • Valentyna Hlukhova

    (Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine)

  • Khrystyna Kravchenko

    (Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine)

Abstract

Environmental protection requires significant financial costs, accumulation and proper spending of funds for the implementation of environmental protection measures, environmental programs and resource-saving projects. Today in Ukraine the state budget is one of the main investors in environmental programs. The purpose of the article is to analyze and assess the state of budgetary financing of the sphere of environmental protection in Ukraine and make proposals for its improvement. The sources of financial support for environmental protection measures in Ukraine have been systematized. The dynamics of total expenditures on the environment, the volumes of actual and planned expenditures of the budget for environmental protection, as well as their structure were analyzed. It was revealed that over the past 5 years, total costs, and in particular budget expenditures for environmental protection in Ukraine, have increased by 1.8 times. However, their share in all expenditures on environmental protection decreased by 0.3%. In 2020, out of the total budgetary expenditures on the environment, most of the funds were allocated to the prevention and elimination of environmental pollution (over 70%) and waste disposal (33.8%). A negative phenomenon is the chronic underperformance of the indicators planned in the budget, as a result of which there is a significant underfunding of environmental protection. In general, over the past six years, the percentage of fulfillment of the planned budget expenditures on environmental protection ranged from 75.8% to 80.0%. To increase the efficiency of the formation and use of budgetary funds for environmental protection, it is necessary: 1) to ensure a sufficient amount of budgetary funding for environmental protection through the search for real additional sources of funding; 2) improve the procedure for budget forecasting and planning of allocation of funds for environmental activities; 3) ensure high-quality control over the timeliness of budget funds receipt, direct funds for their intended purpose in the more priority areas of development of the sphere of environmental protection; 4) ensure targeted and effective use of funds received for the implementation of environmental protection measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Viktor Babichenko & Valentyna Hlukhova & Khrystyna Kravchenko, 2021. "Budgetary Financing of the Environmental Protection Sphere in Ukraine," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 39-47, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2021:i:3:p:39-47
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2021-3(93)-39-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/847-byudzhetne-finansuvannya-sferi-ohoroni-navkolishnogo-prirodnogo-seredovischa-v-ukraini.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/847/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2021-3(93)-39-47?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial support; budgetary financing; budget expenditures; environmental protection; environmental activities; state budget of Ukraine;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H59 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Other
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2021:i:3:p:39-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.