IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2020i2p125-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Aspects of the Budgetary Institution's Equity Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mariya Nashkerska

    ("Lviv Polytechnic" National University, Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Nataliia Mykytyuk

    ("Lviv Polytechnic" National University, Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Volodymyr Olikhovskyi

    ("Lviv Polytechnic" National University, Lviv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Reform the public sector of the Ukrainian economy involves the denationalization of budgetary institutions and the commercialization of their services. To make an effective decision on reforming an institution, the impartial information about its financial position, the level of financial support is required. In the process of assessing the financial state of a budgetary institution, an important role belongs to the analysis of equity. The purpose of the article is to develop methodological positions and practical recommendations for conducting budgetary institution equity analysis. It was established that the decisive impact on the formation of the equity capacity have such as statements as the paid-in capital and the financial result of the estimate execution. The expediency of carrying out the structural and dynamic analysis of equity with the detection of change tendencies of its volumes in general and separately for each component was proved. On the basis of structural and dynamic analysis it was proposed to distinguish the following types of financial support of the budgetary institution: good, satisfactory and unsatisfactory. Good status of financial support is formed by the increase in the amount of paid-in capital and the excess of income over expenditures within the special fund; the satisfactory status involves the growth in the amount of invested capital and the financial result of the implementation of the budget for general and special funds in full; the unsatisfactory status is the decrease in the amount of invested capital and underperformance in terms of filling the special fund. Parametric equity analysis involves the following groups of indicators: the first group includes indicators of the ratio of equity and income (general and special funds), equity and capital expenditures (general and special funds); to the second group includes the indicators that reflect the ratio of different types of capital and characterize the financial independence of the institution from external sources of financing; the third group includes the indicators of the ratio of equity and its components.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariya Nashkerska & Nataliia Mykytyuk & Volodymyr Olikhovskyi, 2020. "Methodological Aspects of the Budgetary Institution's Equity Analysis," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 125-130, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2020:i:2:p:125-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/755-metodologichni-aspekti-analizu-vlasnogo-kapitalu-byudzhetnoi-ustanovi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volodymyr Shevchuk & Taisiya Bondaruk & Nataliya Melnychuk, 2016. "Mechanism of Budgetary Resources Management: Problems and Prospects of Improvement," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 166-175, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      budgetary institution; equity; financial security; financial support; financial result of budgeting;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2020:i:2:p:125-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.