IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarpe/v3y2014i4p384-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Quality of Life and Social Skills between Students with Visual Problems (Blind and Partially Blind) and Normal Students

Author

Listed:
  • Fereshteh Kordestani
  • Azam Daneshfar
  • Davood Roustaee

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the quality of life and social skills between students who are visually impaired (blind and partially blind) and normal students. The population consisted of all students with visual problems (blind and partially blind) and normal students in secondary schools in Tehran in the academic year 2013-2014. Using a multi-stage random sampling method, 40 students were selected from each group. The SF-36s quality of life questionnaire and Foster and Inderbitzen social skills questionnaire were used as research tools. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation coefficient. The results showed that normal people had a better quality of life than those who are blind. There were no significant difference between the partially blind people’s quality of life and blind and normal people’s quality of life. The normal people had better social behavior than partially blind and blind people. In terms of other factors, there was no significant difference between the positive social behavior of partially blind and blind people. However, normal people had weaker negative social behavior than partially blind and blind people. The negative social behavior of partially blind people was weaker than blind people.

Suggested Citation

  • Fereshteh Kordestani & Azam Daneshfar & Davood Roustaee, 2014. "Comparison of Quality of Life and Social Skills between Students with Visual Problems (Blind and Partially Blind) and Normal Students," International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, vol. 3(4), pages 384-391, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarpe:v:3:y:2014:i:4:p:384-391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Comparison_of_Quality_of_Life_and_Social_Skills_between_Students_with_Visual_Problems_(Blind_and_Partially_Blind)_and_Normal_Students.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Comparison_of_Quality_of_Life_and_Social_Skills_between_Students_with_Visual_Problems_(Blind_and_Partially_Blind)_and_Normal_Students.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarpe:v:3:y:2014:i:4:p:384-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARPED .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.