IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hop/hopeec/v35y2003i1p21-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Medio Stat Virtus: An Alternative View of Usury in Adam Smith's Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Pia Paganelli

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Pia Paganelli, 2003. "In Medio Stat Virtus: An Alternative View of Usury in Adam Smith's Thinking," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 21-48, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:35:y:2003:i:1:p:21-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hope.dukejournals.org/content/35/1/21.full.pdf+html
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurie Bréban & André Lapidus, 2019. "Adam Smith on lotteries: an interpretation and formal restatement," Working Papers hal-00914222, HAL.
    2. Diesel, Jonathon, 2021. "Adam Smith on usury: An esoteric reading," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-738.
    3. Arvind Ashta & Laurence Attuel-Mendès & Zaka Ratsimalahelo, 2015. "Another “French paradox”: explaining why interest rates to microenterprises did not increase with the change in French usury legislation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 479-509, December.
    4. Constant Mews & Adrian Walsh, 2011. "Usury and its Critics: From the Middle Ages to Modernity," Chapters, in: Mohamed Ariff & Munawar Iqbal (ed.), The Foundations of Islamic Banking, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Laurie Bréban & André Lapidus, 2019. "Adam Smith on lotteries: an interpretation and formal restatement," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 157-197, January.
    6. Hugh Rockoff, 2003. "Prodigals and Projecture: An Economic History of Usury Laws in the United States from Colonial Times to 1900," NBER Working Papers 9742, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Nathalie Sigot & Laurie Bréban, 2020. "The influence of laws on informal rules: a reassement of the controversy between Jeremy Bentham and Adam Smith on usury [L’influence des lois sur les règles informelles : une relecture de la contro," Post-Print hal-03825528, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adam Smith; usury;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:35:y:2003:i:1:p:21-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.dukeupress.edu/Catalog/ViewProduct.php?viewby=journal&productid=45614 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.