IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/5623282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Coal Mine Safety under the Combination of Game Theory and TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Hongxia Li
  • Lei Chen
  • Fangyuan Tian
  • Lin Zhao
  • Shuicheng Tian
  • Xunjie Gou

Abstract

At present, the frequent occurrence of coal mine accidents in China is a key concern in the field of safety. Although the coal mine accident rate is decreasing due to the progress of technology and the improvement of management, there is still a lack of comprehensive evaluation of the role of various factors in the coal mine. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to establish a game theory combination weight-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation model based on the analysis of various factors affecting coal mine safety. The model combines the weights obtained from fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), entropy weight method (EWM), and back propagation neural network (BP-NN) by using the combination method of game theory and then combines with the TOPSIS method to evaluate 20 indicators in four aspects of a coal mine: personnel, equipment, environment, and management. Taking five mines under Zheng Coal Group as an example, the evaluation results of the game theory combination weight-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation model are compared with those of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the improved composite weight-TOPSIS method. The results show that the safety grade of the five mine samples under Zhengmei Group is ranked as follows: mine 4 > grade II (relatively safe) > mine 2 > mine 5 > grade III (moderately safe) > mine 3 > mine 1 > grade IV (generally safe). The evaluation result of the game theory combination weight-TOPSIS method is basically consistent with the actual safety situation of the coal mine, which reflects the superiority and practicality of the evaluation model. The model has greater differentiation in the process of determining the coal mine safety grade, and the evaluation results are more intuitive and reasonable, which can provide a more effective evaluation tool for the comprehensive evaluation of coal mine safety. Finally, based on the evaluation results, corresponding policy recommendations to improve the status quo of coal mine safety are proposed, aiming to provide decision-making reference for coal mine safety management personnel.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongxia Li & Lei Chen & Fangyuan Tian & Lin Zhao & Shuicheng Tian & Xunjie Gou, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Coal Mine Safety under the Combination of Game Theory and TOPSIS," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:5623282
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/5623282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/5623282.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/5623282.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/5623282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baoxin Zhao & Qimeng Liu & Jingzhong Zhu, 2023. "Risk Assessment and Zonation of Roof Water Inrush Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Principle Component Analysis, and Improved Game Theory (AHP–PCA–IGT) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:5623282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.