Author
Abstract
The paper considers the impact of ambidexterity, consisting of the relationship between exploration and exploitation, on the development of start-ups. The main goal of the study is to determine the importance of ambidexterity’s critical success factors (CSF) for different phases of start-up development. Research covers 27 different CSF and 18 items describing ambidexterity. This set of variables were analysed in terms of seed, early and growth stage of start-up development. The statistical verification of research exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied with maximum likelihood as a factoring method. Study covers 170 start-ups operating in Poland. Respondents of the survey were general managers and business owners. The most important CSF for start-up ambidexterity are strategic cooperation, establishing formal cooperation and dynamic capacity. In terms of ambidexterity crucial activities relate to offering new, unique values for customer and systematically checking customer satisfaction. At the same time CSF as leader’s age and gender or academic training were not significant for start-up ambidexterity. Moreover, research shown that there is crucial difference between seed stage and other phases of start-up development, that require to pay attention to specific areas by the managers. Most of the limitations is a result of applied method of EFA and size of the research sample. Due to achieved sample size it wasn`t possible to form a factor for Expansion stage and Exit stage, therefore these stages weren’t separately analysed in the empirical research. This paper fills the research gap regarding the use of ambidexterity in start-ups and also deepens the knowledge on how to shape individual stages of start-up development, which allowed for recommendations for practitioners and policymakers.
Suggested Citation
Pawel Mielcarek & Klaudiusz Kalisty, 2026.
"Stage-Specific Drivers of Startup Ambidexterity,"
Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 20(1).
Handle:
RePEc:hig:fsight:v:20:y:2026:i:1:31416
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
- O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:20:y:2026:i:1:31416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.