IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gpr/journl/v6y2020i1-2p6-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Russian Federation’s Policies Toward the Korean Security Crisis: Moscow’s Pivot Toward China

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony V. Rinna

Abstract

Amidst the fluctuation in the state of diplomacy over Korean security between the threat of “fire and fury” in 2017 and the period of summitry between 2018-2019, the Russian Federation has demonstrated an unprecedented level of cooperation with the People’s Republic of China over the North Korean security crisis. Factors that have led to Moscow’s increasing alignment with Beijing, in spite of potential Russian strategic anxieties over the rise of Chinese power in East Asia, include Russia’s own lack of clout on the Korean Peninsula as well as stark differences in Russian and American views over how to achieve the denuclearization of the DPRK and peace in Korea. Trends toward Beijing-Moscow policy coordination presenting an alternative vision to American policies over Korean security means that while Russia’s own role as an independent actor in Korean security continues to remain negligible, it is appropriate to speak of Moscow’s role as comprising an element of a Sino-Russian bloc in Korean security dynamics and diplomacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony V. Rinna, 2020. "The Russian Federation’s Policies Toward the Korean Security Crisis: Moscow’s Pivot Toward China," Global Politics Review, Global Politics Review, vol. 6(1-2), pages 6-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:6:y:2020:i:1-2:p:6-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929-v06-i1-2-p006/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    East Asia; Korea; Russia; nuclear program; foreign policy; security.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:6:y:2020:i:1-2:p:6-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.