IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gpr/journl/v4y2018i1p67-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Tinted Politics of Memory: Anniversaries Caught between Political Camps in Taiwan in 2017

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Preker

Abstract

Thirty years after Taiwan lifted martial law in 1987, Taiwanese society today is open to a re-evaluation of its authoritarian past. Following the beginning of the Tsai presidency in 2016, Taiwan’s quest for a national identity has become more perceivable in its memory culture. The year 2017 marked the 70th anniversary of the February 28 Incident as well as the 80th anniversary of the beginning of the Second Sino–Japanese War. Questions of whether and how to commemorate the 1937 Marco Polo Bridge Incident, as well as the search for historical equivalences are overshadowed by the two large political camps and their respective allies. Third parties such as the CCP or Japan also offer conflicting narratives and seek to influence Taiwan’s historiography, which will ultimately shape Taiwan’s future. More than just vying for the prerogative of the interpretation of memory, these issues also led to a more fundamental question: What should be considered Taiwanese history?

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Preker, 2018. "A Tinted Politics of Memory: Anniversaries Caught between Political Camps in Taiwan in 2017," Global Politics Review, Global Politics Review, vol. 4(1), pages 67-77, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:67-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929_v04_i01_p067/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Taiwan; February 28 Incident; Marco Polo Bridge Incident; Politics of Commemoration; National Identity; Chthonic; Tsai Ing-wen.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:67-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.