IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gpr/journl/v4y2018i1p59-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk, Pre-crime and Counterterrorism: Assessing Pakistan’s Approach

Author

Listed:
  • J. Riaz Hussain

Abstract

There is a gradual global shift in understanding counterterrorism from a risk management perspective. It takes into account the idea of Risk Society and can explain diverse practices adopted by states, particularly after September 11, 2001, in tackling terrorism. The resultant birth of a culture of fear dictates deviation in the aim of national security strategies from ensuring justice to safety through pre-emption. The Western states have of late increasingly stressed the need to eliminate the threat of terrorism as their top priority. Surprisingly, though, there is a dearth of certain crucial states in the prevalent discourse, which, despite being disadvantaged in the wake of developmental challenges, have encompassed congruent transformations. This paper aims to analyse whether Pakistan’s security and counterterrorism initiatives match those states that continue to invoke the primary interest of scholars and researchers around the globe. Such analysis retains the lens of risk management as a mode of governance in countering terrorism.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Riaz Hussain, 2018. "Risk, Pre-crime and Counterterrorism: Assessing Pakistan’s Approach," Global Politics Review, Global Politics Review, vol. 4(1), pages 59-66, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:59-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929_v04_i01_p059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk; Counter-Terrorism; Proportionality; Challenges; Appraisal; Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:59-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.