IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gpr/journl/v2y2016i2p9-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Human Use of Human Beings: Suicide Bombing, Technological Innovation, and the Asymmetry of Modern Warfare

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey William Lewis

Abstract

Suicide bombing remains by far the most lethal weapon readily available to terrorist groups. The systematic means by which organizations pressure individuals into becoming living bombs demand that we understand suicide bombing as a technology, an alternative and relatively inexpensive means by which militants have been able to approximate the electronic control systems of states. Such an analysis of suicide bombing is consistent with the history of technology, in which human beings have repeatedly been used as data processing units. By recognizing how and why alternative technologies such as suicide bombing have become so effective we can begin to understand why the expensive and complex weapons deployed by states are sometimes ineffective for combating insurgency resulting in a tremendous mismatch in costs incurred by the two sides. To begin closing this gap state forces must recognize that complex machinery is not necessarily superior to simple devices, and should whenever possible pursue simple, robust solutions to the challenges of modern combat rather than selecting the most expensive and complex option by default.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey William Lewis, 2016. "The Human Use of Human Beings: Suicide Bombing, Technological Innovation, and the Asymmetry of Modern Warfare," Global Politics Review, Global Politics Review, vol. 2(2), pages 9-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:9-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929_v02_i02_p009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    suicide bombing; terrorism; technology; history; modern warfare;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:9-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.