IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gpr/journl/v2y2016i2p40-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Approach of South Korea’s Middle Power Diplomacy: Focusing on Global Agenda Setting

Author

Listed:
  • Kyung Suk Lee

Abstract

In an altering global power architecture, South Korea has the national capacity to contribute to resolving transnational issues and has the potential to support a global common good. But in the discourse of South Korea’s role, the pivotal question has always been “how” to be a responsible middle power. Until now, South Korea has implemented its middle power in four different aspects: (1) Balancing Act in Northeast Asia; (2) ODA policy; (3) UN PKO; and (4) Global agenda setting. However, among the four, South Korea’s focus on balancing in Northeast Asia and ODA policy has been disproportionately concentrated in Asia due to national interests. This paper argues that in order to be a responsible middle power, South Korea should avert from a myopic Asian standpoint and concentrate more on global agenda setting through international institutions and the G20 platform. South Korea’s inherent structural constraints hamper a more proactive engagement in UN PKO. Therefore, global agenda setting is a more appropriate sphere to contribute to the world as a responsible middle power.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyung Suk Lee, 2016. "New Approach of South Korea’s Middle Power Diplomacy: Focusing on Global Agenda Setting," Global Politics Review, Global Politics Review, vol. 2(2), pages 40-57, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:40-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929_v02_i02_p040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    South Korea; middle power diplomacy; global agenda setting; ODA policy; peacekeeping; international institutions.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:40-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.