IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gpr/journl/v1y2015i1p53-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Asian Gold Rush: a Critique of the Win-Win Chinese Strategy Towards Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Camilla Crovella

Abstract

Africa has observed an impressively growing Chinese presence in the last 20 years. Signals of this can be identified in the strong investments the Asian country has carried out on the continent, always depicting such attitude as a business partnership, where the former exploits African raw materials and favours the economic and social development of the latter in return. Indeed, China supports its interest in the African continent on the ground of the win-win strategy, as this partnership would bring advantages to both parties. However, several voices have raised on the international scene, denouncing a Chinese predatory attitude and a form of exploitation, which can be compared to the Western Colonialism. Even if it can be stated that the current situation is not comparable to colonialism in Western conception, it is also undeniable that Africa is being shaped by the Chinese following the model of their own economic, financial and social system. So stated, it is clear that the win-win strategy does no longer suit to such scenery. For this reason, it should be renamed as a win-through strategy, to describe how China is making this partnership successful by turning Africa into a big reproduction of its own system.

Suggested Citation

  • Camilla Crovella, 2015. "The Asian Gold Rush: a Critique of the Win-Win Chinese Strategy Towards Africa," Global Politics Review, Global Politics Review, vol. 1(1), pages 53-62, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:53-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929_v01_i01_p53/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    China; Africa; Sino-African relationship; win-win strategy; going out strategy; non-interference.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:53-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.