IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jtourh/v7y2026i6p165-d1963216.html

Route-Level Carbon Footprint Assessment for Community-Based Tourism Management: A Case Study from Ban Boonjaem, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Piranun Juntapoon

    (School of Management, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand)

  • Krit Sittivangkul

    (Urban Mobility Laboratory, School of Management, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand)

  • Amnuayporn Yaiying

    (Major of Tourism Development, Maejo University, Phrae Campus, Phrae 54140, Thailand)

  • Kassaraporn Tirawong

    (Major of Tourism Development, Maejo University, Phrae Campus, Phrae 54140, Thailand)

  • Parnprae C. Udomraksasup

    (School of Tourism Development, Maejo University, Chiang Mai 50290, Thailand)

  • Tiparad Sahatrongjit

    (Major of Tourism Development, Maejo University, Phrae Campus, Phrae 54140, Thailand)

Abstract

Community-based tourism (CBT) destinations are increasingly expected to align visitor experiences with climate responsibility, yet local managers often lack product-level carbon evidence that can guide practical route redesign and service decisions. This study addresses this aggregation-to-action gap by developing a route-level carbon footprint baseline for a CBT itinerary in Ban Boonjaem, Phrae Province, Thailand. Using an exploratory and applied case study design, the study treats one completed six-hour, non-overnight itinerary as the functional unit and applies a life-cycle-informed operational boundary covering transportation, food and beverage consumption, and solid waste generated during the route test. Primary activity data were collected from one organized route test involving 20 Thai domestic volunteer tourists and were matched with relevant emission factors to estimate total and per-tourist emissions. The tested itinerary generated 0.2234 tCO2e, equivalent to 223.4 kgCO2e in total and approximately 11.2 kgCO2e per tourist per trip. Transportation was the largest emission domain, accounting for 55.89% of total route emissions, followed by food and beverage consumption at 38.55%, while waste contributed 5.56%. Together, transportation and food and beverage represented 94.44% of measured emissions, indicating that the route’s carbon profile was shaped mainly by mobility arrangements and service provisioning rather than waste generation alone. The study contributes a transparent, route-specific operational baseline for low-carbon CBT management. The findings should be interpreted as case-specific decision-support evidence rather than as a destination-wide carbon inventory or statistically generalizable estimate.

Suggested Citation

  • Piranun Juntapoon & Krit Sittivangkul & Amnuayporn Yaiying & Kassaraporn Tirawong & Parnprae C. Udomraksasup & Tiparad Sahatrongjit, 2026. "Route-Level Carbon Footprint Assessment for Community-Based Tourism Management: A Case Study from Ban Boonjaem, Thailand," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:7:y:2026:i:6:p:165-:d:1963216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/7/6/165/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/7/6/165/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:7:y:2026:i:6:p:165-:d:1963216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.