IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i9p1582-d111155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Situational Assessments Based on Uncertainty-Risk Awareness in Complex Traffic Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Guotao Xie

    (Department of Automotive Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
    State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xinyu Zhang

    (Information Technology Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Hongbo Gao

    (State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Lijun Qian

    (Department of Automotive Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Jianqiang Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Electric Vehicles, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Umit Ozguner

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

Abstract

Situational assessment (SA) is one of the key parts for the application of intelligent alternative-energy vehicles (IAVs) in the sustainable transportation. It helps IAVs understand and comprehend traffic environments better. In SA, it is crucial to be aware of uncertainty-risks, such as sensor failure or communication loss. The objective of this study is to assess traffic situations considering uncertainty-risks, including environment predicting uncertainty. According to the stochastic environment model, collision probabilities between multiple vehicles are estimated based on integrated trajectory prediction under uncertainty, which combines the physics- and maneuver-based trajectory prediction models for accurate prediction results in the long term. The SA method considers the probabilities of collision at different predicting points, the masses, and relative speeds between the possible colliding objects. In addition, risks beyond the prediction horizon are considered with the proposition of infinite risk assessments (IRAs). This method is applied and proved to assess risks regarding unexpected obstacles in traffic, sensor failure or communication loss, and imperfect detections with different sensing accuracies of the environment. The results indicate that the SA method could evaluate traffic risks under uncertainty in the dynamic traffic environment. This could help IAVs’ plan motion trajectories and make high-level decisions in uncertain environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Guotao Xie & Xinyu Zhang & Hongbo Gao & Lijun Qian & Jianqiang Wang & Umit Ozguner, 2017. "Situational Assessments Based on Uncertainty-Risk Awareness in Complex Traffic Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1582-:d:111155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1582/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1582/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Won Min Kang & Jae Dong Lee & Young-Sik Jeong & Jong Hyuk Park, 2015. "VCC-SSF: Service-Oriented Security Framework for Vehicular Cloud Computing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Myungwhan Choi & Areeya Rubenecia & Taeshik Shon & Hyo Hyun Choi, 2017. "Velocity Obstacle Based 3D Collision Avoidance Scheme for Low-Cost Micro UAVs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shi An & Lina Ma & Jian Wang, 2020. "Optimization of Traffic Detector Layout Based on Complex Network Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Su Han & Tengfei Wang & Jiaqi Chen & Ying Wang & Bo Zhu & Yiqi Zhou, 2021. "Towards the Human–Machine Interaction: Strategies, Design, and Human Reliability Assessment of Crews’ Response to Daily Cargo Ship Navigation Tasks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Tuqiang Zhou & Junyi Zhang & Dashzeveg Baasansuren, 2018. "A Hybrid HFACS-BN Model for Analysis of Mongolian Aviation Professionals’ Awareness of Human Factors Related to Aviation Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esmaeil Mehraeen & Marjan Ghazisaeedi & Jebraeil Farzi & Saghar Mirshekari, 2017. "Security Challenges in Healthcare Cloud Computing: A Systematic Review," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 157-157, March.
    2. Alia Ghaddar & Ahmad Merei, 2020. "EAOA: Energy-Aware Grid-Based 3D-Obstacle Avoidance in Coverage Path Planning for UAVs," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1582-:d:111155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.