IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1704-d112831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disinfection in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Evaluation of Effectiveness and Acute Toxicity Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Cristina Collivignarelli

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Alessandro Abbà

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Gianpaolo Alloisio

    (Department of Brescia, ARPA Lombardia (Regional Agency for Environmental Protection), via Cantore 20, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Eleonora Gozio

    (Department of Brescia, ARPA Lombardia (Regional Agency for Environmental Protection), via Cantore 20, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

  • Ilaria Benigna

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

Abstract

In Italy, urban wastewater disinfection is regulated in the third part of Legislative Decree n. 152/2006, which states that wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) must include a disinfection unit, with a capacity exceeding 2000 Population Equivalent (PE). This treatment shall ensure microbial quality and health security. The legislation provides the following limits for wastewater: E scherichia coli ( E. coli ) concentration below 5000 CFU 100 mL −1 (recommended value), active chlorine concentration below 0.2 mg L −1 and lack of acute toxicity. The compliance with these conditions is shown by means of the study of correct disinfectant dosage, which also depends on wastewater characteristics. An investigation at the regional level (from 2013 to 2016) shows a correlation between acute toxicity discharge and disinfection treatment through chemical reagents (mainly with the use of chlorine compounds and peracetic acid). The experimental work concerns two active sludge WWTPs in northern Italy with small capacity (10,000–12,000 PE). The activities provide the assessment of microbiological quality and toxicity of WWTPs effluents in relation to the dosage of sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid, by means of the use of batch tests. The results show that with similar disinfectant dosage and comparable initial E. coli concentration, peracetic acid exhibits the best performance in terms of microbial removal (with removal yields up to 99.99%). Moreover, the acute toxicity was evident at higher doses and therefore with higher residuals of peracetic acid (2.68 mg L −1 ) compared to the free residual chlorine (0.17 mg L −1 ).

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Cristina Collivignarelli & Alessandro Abbà & Gianpaolo Alloisio & Eleonora Gozio & Ilaria Benigna, 2017. "Disinfection in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Evaluation of Effectiveness and Acute Toxicity Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1704-:d:112831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Cristina Collivignarelli & Alessandro Abbà & Ilaria Benigna & Sabrina Sorlini & Vincenzo Torretta, 2017. "Overview of the Main Disinfection Processes for Wastewater and Drinking Water Treatment Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Irena Tušer & Alena Oulehlová, 2021. "Risk Assessment and Sustainability of Wastewater Treatment Plant Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1704-:d:112831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.