IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i9p921-d77874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Land Use and Land Cover of Geotagged Social-Sensing Images Using Naive Bayes Classifier

Author

Listed:
  • Asamaporn Sitthi

    (Remote Sensing and GIS, School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Masahiko Nagai

    (Remote Sensing and GIS, School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Matthew Dailey

    (Computer Science and Information Management, School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Sarawut Ninsawat

    (Remote Sensing and GIS, School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

Abstract

Online social media crowdsourced photos contain a vast amount of visual information about the physical properties and characteristics of the earth’s surface. Flickr is an important online social media platform for users seeking this information. Each day, users generate crowdsourced geotagged digital imagery containing an immense amount of information. In this paper, geotagged Flickr images are used for automatic extraction of low-level land use/land cover (LULC) features. The proposed method uses a naive Bayes classifier with color, shape, and color index descriptors. The classified images are mapped using a majority filtering approach. The classifier performance in overall accuracy, kappa coefficient, precision, recall, and f-measure was 87.94%, 82.89%, 88.20%, 87.90%, and 88%, respectively. Labeled-crowdsourced images were filtered into a spatial tile of a 30 m × 30 m resolution using the majority voting method to reduce geolocation uncertainty from the crowdsourced data. These tile datasets were used as training and validation samples to classify Landsat TM5 images. The supervised maximum likelihood method was used for the LULC classification. The results show that the geotagged Flickr images can classify LULC types with reasonable accuracy and that the proposed approach improves LULC classification efficiency if a sufficient spatial distribution of crowdsourced data exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Asamaporn Sitthi & Masahiko Nagai & Matthew Dailey & Sarawut Ninsawat, 2016. "Exploring Land Use and Land Cover of Geotagged Social-Sensing Images Using Naive Bayes Classifier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:921-:d:77874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacinto Estima & Marco Painho, 2014. "Photo Based Volunteered Geographic Information Initiatives: A Comparative Study of their Suitability for Helping Quality Control of Corine Land Cover," International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), IGI Global, vol. 5(3), pages 73-89, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Dax & Karin Schroll & Ingrid Machold & Martyna Derszniak-Noirjean & Bernd Schuh & Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen, 2021. "Land Abandonment in Mountain Areas of the EU: An Inevitable Side Effect of Farming Modernization and Neglected Threat to Sustainable Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Chuanrong Zhang & Xinba Li, 2022. "Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in the Era of Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Bidur Devkota & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Apichon Witayangkurn & Sohee Minsun Kim, 2019. "Using Volunteered Geographic Information and Nighttime Light Remote Sensing Data to Identify Tourism Areas of Interest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Megersa Kebede Leta & Tamene Adugna Demissie & Jens Tränckner, 2021. "Modeling and Prediction of Land Use Land Cover Change Dynamics Based on Land Change Modeler (LCM) in Nashe Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Tuqiang Zhou & Junyi Zhang & Dashzeveg Baasansuren, 2018. "A Hybrid HFACS-BN Model for Analysis of Mongolian Aviation Professionals’ Awareness of Human Factors Related to Aviation Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:921-:d:77874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.