IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i7p8132-8150d51603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Knowledge to Promote Sustainability in Australian Transport Infrastructure Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Yang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, G.P.O. Box 2434, Brisbane 4001 QLD, Australia)

  • Mei Yuan

    (School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, G.P.O. Box 2434, Brisbane 4001 QLD, Australia)

  • Tan Yigitcanlar

    (School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, G.P.O. Box 2434, Brisbane 4001 QLD, Australia)

  • Peter Newman

    (Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute (CUSP), Curtin University, G.P.O. Box U1987, Perth 6845 WA, Australia)

  • Frank Schultmann

    (Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hertzstrasse 16, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract

To deliver tangible sustainability outcomes, the infrastructure sector of the construction industry needs to build capacities for the creation, application and management of ever increasing knowledge. This paper intends to establish the importance and key issues of promoting sustainability through knowledge management (KM). It presents a new conceptual framework for managing sustainability knowledge to raise the awareness and direct future research in the field of transport infrastructure, one of the fast growing sectors in Australia. A holistic KM approach is adopted in this research to consider the potential to “deliver the right information to the right person at the right time” in the context of sustainable development of infrastructure. A questionnaire survey among practitioners across the nation confirmed the necessity and identified priority issues of managing knowledge for sustainability. During infrastructure development, KM can help build much needed industry consensus, develop capacity, communicate decisions, and promote specific measures for the pursuit of sustainability. Six essential elements of the KM approach and their priority issues informed the establishment of a conceptual KM framework. The transport infrastructure sector has come to realise that development must not come at the expense of environmental and social objectives. In practice however, it is facing extensive challenges to deliver what has been promised in the sustainability agenda. This research demonstrates the importance of managing sustainability knowledge, integration of various stakeholders, facilitation of plans and actions and delivery of tangible benefits in real projects, as a positive step towards meeting these challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Yang & Mei Yuan & Tan Yigitcanlar & Peter Newman & Frank Schultmann, 2015. "Managing Knowledge to Promote Sustainability in Australian Transport Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:7:p:8132-8150:d:51603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/7/8132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/7/8132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Newman, 2014. "Density, the Sustainability Multiplier: Some Myths and Truths with Application to Perth, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wendan Zhang & Jian Lu & Ping Xu & Yi Zhang, 2015. "Moving towards Sustainability: Road Grades and On-Road Emissions of Heavy-Duty Vehicles—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Yavuz Duvarcı & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2019. "Can Tube Tunnel Crossings Relieve Urban Congestion Problems? Izmir Tube Tunnel Project Proposal Under Scrutiny," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Andrés F. Ugalde Vásquez & David Naranjo-Gil, 2020. "Management Accounting Systems, Top Management Teams, and Sustainable Knowledge Acquisition: Effects on Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Yuen, Kum Fai & Li, Kevin X., 2020. "Environmental governance of transportation infrastructure under Belt and Road Initiative: A unified framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 189-199.
    5. Tan Yigitcanlar & Md. Kamruzzaman, 2015. "Planning, Development and Management of Sustainable Cities: A Commentary from the Guest Editors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Pattarin Sanguankaew & Vichita Vathanophas Ractham, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of Research on Knowledge Management and Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Taewook Huh & Hyung-Ju Kim, 2018. "Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Kamran Khan & Katarzyna Szopik Depczyńska & Izabela Dembińska & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2022. "Most Relevant Sustainability Criteria for Urban Infrastructure Projects—AHP Analysis for the Gulf States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Newman, Peter & Davies-Slate, Sebastian & Jones, Evan, 2018. "The Entrepreneur Rail Model: Funding urban rail through majority private investment in urban regeneration," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 19-28.
    2. Jyothi Chava & Peter Newman, 2016. "Stakeholder Deliberation on Developing Affordable Housing Strategies: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Transit-Oriented Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Magnus Moglia & John Hopkins & Anne Bardoel, 2021. "Telework, Hybrid Work and the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Policy Coherence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:7:p:8132-8150:d:51603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.