IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3970-d1644989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freeway Curve Safety Evaluation Based on Truck Traffic Data Extracted by Floating Car Data

Author

Listed:
  • Fu’an Lan

    (School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

  • Chi Zhang

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Min Zhang

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yichao Xie

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Bo Wang

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

Due to complex traffic conditions, freeway curves are associated with higher crash rates, particularly for trucks, which poses significant safety risks. Predicting truck crash rates on curves is essential for enhancing freeway safety. However, geometric design consistency indicators (GDCIs) are limited in terms of their ability to evaluate safety levels. To address this, this study identifies key factors influencing truck crash rates on curves and proposes a new safety evaluation indicator, the mean speed change rate (MSCR). A vague set, as an extension of the fuzzy set, was employed to integrate the MSCR and GDCI to identify high-risk curves. The factors contributing to differences in crash rates between the curves to the left and right are also analyzed. To assess the proposed approach, a case study was conducted using truck traffic data extracted from floating car data (FCD) collected on 32 freeway curves. The results demonstrate that the deflection angle, radius, and deflection direction are key contributions to truck crash risks. Importantly, the recognition accuracy of the MSCR indicator for crash risks on curves to the left and right is improved by 11.8% and 18.2% compared with GDCIs. Combining the proposed MSCR indicator with GDCIs can more comprehensively evaluate the safety of curves, with recognition accuracy rates of 88.2% and 27.3%, respectively. The indicator change value of the curves to the left are always larger, and the difference is more obvious as the geometric indicator changes. The MSCR indicator provides a more comprehensive curve safety assessment method than existing indicators, which is expected to promote the formulation of curve safety management strategies and further achieve sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu’an Lan & Chi Zhang & Min Zhang & Yichao Xie & Bo Wang, 2025. "Freeway Curve Safety Evaluation Based on Truck Traffic Data Extracted by Floating Car Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3970-:d:1644989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3970/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3970/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu-Long Pei & Yong-Ming He & Bin Ran & Jia Kang & Yu-Ting Song, 2020. "Horizontal Alignment Security Design Theory and Application of Superhighways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Yongming & Kang, Jia & Pei, Yulong & Ran, Bin & Song, Yuting, 2021. "Research on influencing factors of fuel consumption on superhighway based on DEMATEL-ISM model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Jie Yan & Sheng Zeng & Bijiang Tian & Yuanwen Cao & Wenchen Yang & Feng Zhu, 2023. "Relationship between Highway Geometric Characteristics and Accident Risk: A Multilayer Perceptron Model (MLP) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Yong-Ming He & Jia Kang & Yu-Long Pei & Bin Ran & Yu-Ting Song, 2020. "Study on a Prediction Model of Superhighway Fuel Consumption Based on the Test of Easy Car Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3970-:d:1644989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.