IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3910-d1643103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-Culture of Gracilariopsis longissima Seaweed and Penaeus monodon Shrimp for Environmental and Economic Resilience in Poor South-East Asian Coastal Aquaculture Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Reindert W. Nauta

    (Wageningen Marine Research, Haringkade 1, P.O. Box 68, 1976CP IJmuiden, The Netherlands)

  • Romy A. Lansbergen

    (Wageningen Marine Research, Haringkade 1, P.O. Box 68, 1976CP IJmuiden, The Netherlands)

  • Restiana W. Ariyati

    (Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Jawa Tengha 50275, Indonesia)

  • Lestari L. Widowati

    (Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Jawa Tengha 50275, Indonesia)

  • Sri Rejeki

    (Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Jawa Tengha 50275, Indonesia)

  • Adolphe O. Debrot

    (Wageningen Marine Research, Haringkade 1, P.O. Box 68, 1976CP IJmuiden, The Netherlands
    Marine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen University Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

A significant body of controlled laboratory research suggests different biological mechanisms by which the low-cost co-culture of seaweed and shrimp could improve sustainability whilst increasing income for the many poor pond farmers of South-East Asia. However, at the pond level, production and cost–benefit assessments remain largely lacking. Here, we studied the extensive co-culture of Gracilariopsis longissima seaweed and Penaeus monodon shrimp on pond production output, nutrient concentrations, and farm income on the north coast of Java, Indonesia. Co-culture showed 18% higher seaweed production during the first cycle (2261.0 ± 348.0 kg·ha −1 ) and 27% higher production during the second (2,361.0 ± 127.3 kg·ha −1 ) compared to monoculture. Shrimp production per cycle was 53.8% higher in co-culture (264.4 ± 47.6 kg·ha −1 ) than in single-species cultivation (171.7 ± 10.4 kg·ha −1 ). Seaweed agar content and gel strength did not differ between treatments, and neither did shrimp bacterial or heavy metals concentrations. The profit of co-culture was, respectively, 156% and 318% compared to single-species seaweed and shrimp cultivation. Co-cultivation lowered nutrient loading in the pond water and in the sediment and is argued to be a low-investment and environmentally friendly option for poor pond farmers to improve their income and financial resilience through product diversification.

Suggested Citation

  • Reindert W. Nauta & Romy A. Lansbergen & Restiana W. Ariyati & Lestari L. Widowati & Sri Rejeki & Adolphe O. Debrot, 2025. "Co-Culture of Gracilariopsis longissima Seaweed and Penaeus monodon Shrimp for Environmental and Economic Resilience in Poor South-East Asian Coastal Aquaculture Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3910-:d:1643103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3910/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3910/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3910-:d:1643103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.