IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3649-d1637139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Regional Health and Environmental Outcomes Using Weighted Neutrosophic Similarity Measures: A Benchmarking Approach for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Subbiah Vinoth

    (Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, Vadlamudi 522213, Andhra Pradesh, India)

  • Venkateswarlu Nalluri

    (Department of Information Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City 413310, Taiwan)

  • Sudam Sekhar Panda

    (Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, Vadlamudi 522213, Andhra Pradesh, India)

  • Guravaiah Bandi

    (Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, Vadlamudi 522213, Andhra Pradesh, India)

  • Naveen Kumar Bheemaiah Nagaraju

    (Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, Vadlamudi 522213, Andhra Pradesh, India)

  • Savithri Vijayakumar

    (Department of Sciences and Humanities (Mathematics), Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore 641021, Tamilnadu, India)

Abstract

Humanity faces significant challenges in achieving internationally agreed sustainable development goals, particularly in reducing public health risks and improving the environmental quality. Measuring and comparing performance across regions requires a systematic and transparent framework. This study explores the application of sustainable development indicators, including a mortality rate attributed to exposure to unsafe WASH services (SDG 3.9.2), a mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution (SDG 3.9.1), and a mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning to assess regional health outcomes. Using data from 50 countries across five sub-regions of Asia, this research applies a weighted neutrosophic similarity measure based on the Hausdorff metric to evaluate regional alignment with an ideal benchmark. The results reveal significant disparities across regions, highlighting Central Asia as the closest to the benchmark, while South and West Asia exhibit substantial gaps. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers to improve public health infrastructure and address environmental challenges, promoting equitable and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Subbiah Vinoth & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Sudam Sekhar Panda & Guravaiah Bandi & Naveen Kumar Bheemaiah Nagaraju & Savithri Vijayakumar, 2025. "Assessing Regional Health and Environmental Outcomes Using Weighted Neutrosophic Similarity Measures: A Benchmarking Approach for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3649-:d:1637139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Sujahangir Kabir Sarkar & Akio Takemoto & Sumaiya Sadeka & Mohammad Muzahidul Islam & Abul Quasem Al-Amin, 2022. "Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) among the South Asian Countries: Progress and Challenges," International Journal of Regional Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 1-42, December.
    2. Wen-Kuo Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Suresh Ma & Mei-Min Lin & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "An Exploration of the Critical Risk Factors in Sustainable Telecom Services: An Analysis of Indian Telecom Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Tahir Mahmood & Ubaid Ur Rehman & Abdul Jaleel & Jabbar Ahmmad & Ronnason Chinram, 2022. "Bipolar Complex Fuzzy Soft Sets and Their Applications in Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaopeng Yang & Tahir Mahmood & Ubaid ur Rehman, 2022. "Bipolar Complex Fuzzy Subgroups," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Wen-Kuo Chen & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Interrelationship among CE Adoption Obstacles of Supply Chain in the Textile Sector: Based on the DEMATEL-ISM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Xueyan Wang & Hong Wu & Lu Lu, 2021. "A Novel Service Provision Mode for Sustainable Development of the Telecom Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Nalluri, Venkateswarlu & Chen, Long-Sheng, 2024. "Modelling the FinTech adoption barriers in the context of emerging economies—An integrated Fuzzy hybrid approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Hamza Pervez & Yousaf Ali & Dragan Pamucar & Mónika Garai-Fodor & Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir, 2022. "Evaluation of critical risk factors in the implementation of modular construction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Jagriti Singh & Krishan Kumar Pandey & Anil Kumar & Farheen Naz & Sunil Luthra, 2023. "Drivers, barriers and practices of net zero economy: An exploratory knowledge based supply chain multi-stakeholder perspective framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1059-1090, September.
    7. Chih-Hung Hsu & Ru-Yue Yu & An-Yuan Chang & Wan-Ling Liu & An-Ching Sun, 2022. "Applying Integrated QFD-MCDM Approach to Strengthen Supply Chain Agility for Mitigating Sustainable Risks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-41, February.
    8. Sagvan Y. Musa & Amlak I. Alajlan & Baravan A. Asaad & Zanyar A. Ameen, 2025. "N-Bipolar Soft Expert Sets and Their Applications in Robust Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3649-:d:1637139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.