Author
Listed:
- Caroline M. Y. Law
(Nature in situ Limited, Hong Kong SAR, China)
- Hoi Yi Law
(Department of Construction, Environment and Engineering, Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)
- Chi Ho Li
(Department of Construction, Environment and Engineering, Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)
- Chung Wai Leung
(Department of Applied Science, School of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Ho Man Tin, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)
- Min Pan
(Department of Applied Science, School of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Ho Man Tin, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)
- Si Chen
(Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Faculty of Construction and Environment, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)
- Kenrick C. K. Ho
(Department of Applied Science, School of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Ho Man Tin, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)
- Yik Tung Sham
(Department of Applied Science, School of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Ho Man Tin, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)
Abstract
Modular green wall, or living wall (LW) system, has evolved worldwide over the past decades as a popular green building feature and a nature-based solution. Differential climatic conditions across the globe make the standardisation of practices inapplicable to local scenarios. LW projects with differing goals and preferences like aesthetic (such as plant healthiness), water-saving, and minimal plant growth require optimal combinations of plant species to achieve single or multiple goals. This exploratory study aimed to deploy empirical field LW data to optimise analytical models to support plant species selection and LW design. Plant growth performance and water demand data of 29 commonly used plant species in outdoor modular LW systems without irrigation were collected in subtropical Hong Kong for 3 weeks. The 29 species tested were grouped into five plant forms: herbaceous perennials (16 spp), succulents (2 spp), ferns (2 spp), shrubs (7 spp), and trees (2 spp). Plant species-specific plant height, LAI, plant health rating, and water absorption amount were recorded every 6 days, together with photo records. Total water demand varied widely among plant species, ranging from 52.5 to 342.5 mL in 3 weeks (equivalent to 2.5 to 16.3 mL per day). The random forest algorithm proved that the water demand of the species was a dominant predictor of plant health tendency, among other parameters. Hierarchical clustering grouped plant species with similar water demand and health rating tendencies into four groups. The health rating threshold approach identified the top-performing species that displayed a healthy appearance as a basic prerequisite, coupled with one or two optional objectives: (1) water-saving and (2) slow-growing. The comparison among the plant selection scenarios based on projected LW performance (water demand, plant health, and growth) provided sound evidence for the optimisation of LW design for sustainability. LW projects with multiple objectives inherited a multitude of multi-scalar properties; thus, the simulation of LW performance in this study demonstrated a novel data-driven approach to optimise plant species selection and planting design with minimal resource input.
Suggested Citation
Caroline M. Y. Law & Hoi Yi Law & Chi Ho Li & Chung Wai Leung & Min Pan & Si Chen & Kenrick C. K. Ho & Yik Tung Sham, 2025.
"Data-Driven Approach for Optimising Plant Species Selection and Planting Design on Outdoor Modular Green Wall with Aesthetic, Maintenance, and Water-Saving Goals,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3528-:d:1634866
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3528-:d:1634866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.