IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3451-d1633634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drone Noise Reduction Using Serration–Finlet Blade Design and Its Psychoacoustic and Social Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Yingyin Shen

    (School of Social Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China)

  • Yuanqing Bai

    (School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

  • Xiao Liu

    (School of Civil, Aerospace and Design Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK)

  • Bin Zang

    (School of Civil, Aerospace and Design Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK)

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles, particularly drones, have been increasingly deployed for different tasks in the community. They have become an important part of the economic and social benefits that society is exploiting from modern technology development. However, efforts are still required to further develop technologies which can mitigate the negative impacts. Among them, drone noise is considered a major health concern for the community. The present study undertakes an experimental investigation of the effectiveness of blade modifications on drone noise in an aeroacoustic wind tunnel facility. A quadcopter drone is programmed to operate in both hover and forward flights. Three modified blade configurations, including trailing-edge serrations combined serration–finlets, and an unmodified (baseline) blade, are manufactured. The far-field noise signals are recorded by two polar microphone arrays to quantify both the magnitude and directivity. The results show that all modified blades are able to reduce the drone noise at mid-to-high frequencies in both hover and forward flights, and this leads to a noticeable reduction in the overall sound pressure level. More importantly, the combined serration–finlet configuration outperforms all the other blades. Psychoacoustic analysis is also performed using the far-field acoustic time series. Interestingly, only the serration–finlet combination demonstrates a consistent reduction in the psychoacoustic annoyance levels, suggesting that it is important to use metrics from both acoustic and psychoacoustic analysis when developing noise mitigation strategies in the socio-economic context.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingyin Shen & Yuanqing Bai & Xiao Liu & Bin Zang, 2025. "Drone Noise Reduction Using Serration–Finlet Blade Design and Its Psychoacoustic and Social Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3451-:d:1633634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3451/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3451/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Ramos-Romero & Nathan Green & Seth Roberts & Charlotte Clark & Antonio J. Torija, 2022. "Requirements for Drone Operations to Minimise Community Noise Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Antonio J. Torija & Rory K. Nicholls, 2022. "Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Antonio J. Torija & Charlotte Clark, 2021. "A Psychoacoustic Approach to Building Knowledge about Human Response to Noise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Ramos-Romero & Nathan Green & Seth Roberts & Charlotte Clark & Antonio J. Torija, 2022. "Requirements for Drone Operations to Minimise Community Noise Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Wang, Ning & Mutzner, Nico & Blanchet, Karl, 2023. "Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Kähler, Svantje T. & Abben, Thomas & Luna-Rodriguez, Aquiles & Tomat, Miriam & Jacobsen, Thomas, 2022. "An assessment of the acceptance and aesthetics of UAVs and helicopters through an experiment and a survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Jianwei Sun & Koichi Yonezawa & Eiji Shima & Hao Liu, 2023. "Integrated Evaluation of the Aeroacoustics and Psychoacoustics of a Single Propeller," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Antonio J. Torija & Rory K. Nicholls, 2022. "Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Agnieszka Rosciszewska & Maciej Buszkiewicz & Gabriela Dobrzynska-Kobylec & Anna Klichowska & Tomasz Przybyla & Blanka B. Nagy & Andrzej Wicher & Michal Klichowski, 2025. "Cognitive neuroscience approach to explore the impact of wind turbine noise on various mental functions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Beat Schäffer & Reto Pieren & Kurt Heutschi & Jean Marc Wunderli & Stefan Becker, 2021. "Drone Noise Emission Characteristics and Noise Effects on Humans—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-27, June.
    9. C. T. Justine Hui & Michael J. Kingan & Yusuke Hioka & Gian Schmid & George Dodd & Kim N. Dirks & Shaun Edlin & Sean Mascarenhas & Young-Min Shim, 2021. "Quantification of the Psychoacoustic Effect of Noise from Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3451-:d:1633634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.