IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3442-d1633433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circular Economy in Chinese Heritage Conservation: Upcycling Waste Materials for Sustainable Restoration and Cultural Narrative Revitalization

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Cao

    (School of Art, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    School of Theater, Film and Television, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yaqi Zhang

    (School of Chinese Languages & Literatures, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jian Liu

    (Metaverse Industrial College, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330052, China)

Abstract

Material depletion, environmental degradation, and cultural revitalization pose significant challenges to heritage conservation in China. Within the context of heritage restoration, the principles of the circular economy (CE)—including R1 (Reduce), R2 (Reuse), and R3 (Recycle)—can provide a structured framework for sustainable interventions. By prioritizing resource efficiency, minimizing waste generation, and repurposing materials, CE strategies support the preservation of cultural heritage while mitigating environmental impact. This study explores the role of waste material upcycling in sustainable heritage conservation (SHC) in tandem with the revitalization of cultural narratives. This study examines the core factors affecting sustainable restoration practice through the lens of the circular economy theory and sustainable heritage conservation theory. The research design adopts mixed methods whereby quantitative web surveys are conducted among practitioners of conservation and complemented with qualitative case studies from CE-based intervention restoration projects in China. The study identifies five independent variables—upcycling of waste materials, resource efficiency, stakeholder engagement, economic viability, and cultural narrative revitalization—with sustainability-driven innovation acting as a mediating factor. Preliminary findings indicate that upcycling enhances material longevity and minimizes restoration expenses while promoting social acceptance of circular practices through stakeholder engagement. Revitalizing cultural narratives enhances historical continuity while preserving intangible heritage. The results indicate that CE-based interventions positively influenced SHC, with sustainability-driven innovation as a mediator. With this, it was concluded that introducing circular economy principles in heritage conservation would promote environmental sustainability, economic viability, and culture-building resilience. Policy recommendations include incentivizing upcycling technologies, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration, and embedding CE principles in national heritage policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Cao & Yaqi Zhang & Jian Liu, 2025. "Circular Economy in Chinese Heritage Conservation: Upcycling Waste Materials for Sustainable Restoration and Cultural Narrative Revitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3442-:d:1633433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yujia Zhu & Jusheng Song & Yunxi Bai, 2024. "China’s Urban Regeneration Evolution from 1949 to 2022: From the Perspective of Governance Mode," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Abraham Zhang & V. G. Venkatesh & Jason X. Wang & Venkatesh Mani & Ming Wan & Ting Qu, 2023. "Drivers of Industry 4.0-Enabled Smart Waste Management in Supply Chain Operations: A Circular Economy Perspective in China," Post-Print hal-04906911, HAL.
    3. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Jermina Stanojev & Christer Gustafsson, 2021. "Smart Specialisation Strategies for Elevating Integration of Cultural Heritage into Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Bosone & Pasquale De Toro & Luigi Fusco Girard & Antonia Gravagnuolo & Silvia Iodice, 2021. "Indicators for Ex-Post Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Impacts in the Perspective of the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Viola Fabi & Maria Pilar Vettori & Emilio Faroldi, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse Practices and Sustainable Urban Development: Perspectives of Innovation for European Historic Spa Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Hala Sirror, 2024. "Innovative Approaches to Windcatcher Design: A Review on Balancing Tradition Sustainability and Modern Technologies for Enhanced Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Tomas Kačerauskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Rasa Bartkute, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Creative Economy: Evidence from a Lithuanian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Francesca Di Turo & Laura Medeghini, 2021. "How Green Possibilities Can Help in a Future Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Carlos J. Pardo Abad, 2020. "Valuation of Industrial Heritage in Terms of Sustainability: Some Cases of Tourist Reference in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Luigi Petti & Claudia Trillo & Busisiwe Ncube Makore, 2020. "Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development Targets: A Possible Harmonisation? Insights from the European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Saja Kosanović & Branislav Folić & Stefan Kovačević & Ivana Nikolić & Ljubiša Folić, 2019. "A Study on the Sustainability of the Traditional Sirinić Houses in the Šar Mountain Region, the South-Western Balkans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Mustafa Özgeriş & Neslihan Demircan & Ayşe Karahan & Oğuz Gökçe & Faris Karahan & Işık Sezen & Elif Akpınar Külekçi, 2024. "Cultural Heritage Management in the Context of Sustainable Tourism: The Case of Öşkvank Monastery (Uzundere, Erzurum)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Gül Aktürk & Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi, 2021. "Cultural Landscapes under the Threat of Climate Change: A Systematic Study of Barriers to Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Hamza Alqudah & Mohammad Al-Qudah & Yazan Abu Huson & Abdalwali Lutfi & Mahmaod Alrawad & Mohammed Amin Almaiah, 2024. "A Decade of Green Economic Literature: An Analysis-Based Bibliometric," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 497-511, May.
    14. Tiziano Cattaneo & Emanuele Giorgi & Mauricio Flores & Viviana Barquero, 2020. "Territorial Effects of Shared-Living Heritage Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    15. Aspasia E. Fafouti & Anastasia Vythoulka & Ekaterini T. Delegou & Nikolaos Farmakidis & Maria Ioannou & Komninos Perellis & Antonis Giannikouris & Nikolaos A. Kampanis & George Alexandrakis & Antonia , 2023. "Designing Cultural Routes as a Tool of Responsible Tourism and Sustainable Local Development in Isolated and Less Developed Islands: The Case of Symi Island in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-39, August.
    16. Yidan Wang & Yixuan Zhou, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence-Driven Interactive Experience for Intangible Cultural Heritage: Sustainable Innovation of Blue Clamp-Resist Dyeing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Marko Nikolić & Boško Drobnjak & Irena Kuletin Ćulafić, 2020. "The Possibilities of Preservation, Regeneration and Presentation of Industrial Heritage: The Case of Old Mint “A.D.” on Belgrade Riverfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-36, June.
    18. Luigi Fusco Girard & Francesca Nocca, 2019. "Moving Towards the Circular Economy/City Model: Which Tools for Operationalizing This Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-48, November.
    19. F.J. Cristófol & Elena Cruz-Ruiz & Gorka Zamarreño-Aramendia, 2021. "Transmission of Place Branding Values through Experiential Events: Wine BC Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Wei Ren & Feng Han, 2018. "Indicators for Assessing the Sustainability of Built Heritage Attractions: An Anglo-Chinese Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3442-:d:1633433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.