IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3075-d1624599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Reporting in the Opinion of Managers in Food Companies in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Marzena Ganc

    (Department of Finance, Institute of Economic and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—WULS, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Tomasz Felczak

    (Department of Finance, Institute of Economic and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—WULS, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Due mainly to tightened regulatory frameworks and rising stakeholder expectations, sustainability reporting has become essential to corporate governance. This study examines the perceptions of middle and senior management about sustainability reporting and the degree of implementation in Poland’s food industry. One hundred eighteen respondents from 26 food businesses participated in a poll to provide their opinions. This study examines the respondents’ awareness of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) frameworks, their understanding of sustainability reporting, and compliance with pertinent standards. The results show that the industry is becoming more conscious of sustainability reporting. However, there are still a lot of differences in how it is interpreted and applied, especially regarding the size of the organization. Compared to smaller companies, managers at larger organizations typically have a deeper understanding of ESG principles and reporting standards. The most commonly cited issues in the field under study are the complexity of reporting frameworks, a lack of knowledge of ESG reporting standards, and a lack of internal resources. Most respondents agree that sustainability reporting is crucial for enhancing a company’s reputation and maintaining long-term competitiveness in the market. This article provides recommendations for expanding educational and training programs that could help increase awareness and develop managerial skills related to sustainability in the food sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzena Ganc & Tomasz Felczak, 2025. "Sustainability Reporting in the Opinion of Managers in Food Companies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3075-:d:1624599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    2. Josef Baumüller & Karina Sopp, 2021. "Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: review, outlook and implications," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 8-28, December.
    3. Richard M. Crossley & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim, 2021. "Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3740-3762, December.
    4. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-04-2021-0114 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Dariusz Michalski, 2024. "Operationalization of ESG-Integrated Strategy Through the Balanced Scorecard in FMCG Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping, 2020. "The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Camelia Oprean-Stan & Ionica Oncioiu & Iulia Cristina Iuga & Sebastian Stan, 2020. "Impact of Sustainability Reporting and Inadequate Management of ESG Factors on Corporate Performance and Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Carla Del Gesso & Rab Nawaz Lodhi, 2024. "Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies," Journal of Accounting Literature, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(2), pages 433-461, January.
    9. Liu, Yuxiang & Zhang, Jiewei & Dai, Yue, 2023. "Analyst following and greenwashing decision," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    10. Jie Huang & Derek D. Wang & Yiying Wang, 2024. "Textual Attributes of Corporate Sustainability Reports and ESG Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mi Sook Lee, 2024. "The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: Moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2797-2810, June.
    2. Farah Mneimneh & Michel Kodsi & Marc Chamoun & Mohammad Basharoush & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2023. "How Can Green Energy Technology Innovations Improve the Carbon-Related Environmental Dimension of ESG Rating?," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 2183-2199, December.
    3. Mărioara Beleneși & Victoria Bogdan & Dorina Nicoleta Popa, 2021. "Disclosure Dynamics and Non-Financial Reporting Analysis. The Case of Romanian Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Abdulateif A Almulhim & Abdullah A Aljughaiman & Thamir Al Barrak & Kaouther Chebbi & Nagwa Amin, 2024. "The power of ESG in shaping dividend policy: Illuminating the role of financial sustainability in an emerging market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Rosalia Castellano & Gennaro Punzo & Giuseppe Scandurra & Antonio Thomas, 2022. "Exploring antecedents of innovations for small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises' environmental sustainability: An interpretative framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1730-1748, May.
    6. Gaurav Jyoti & Ashu Khanna, 2024. "How does sustainability performance affect firms' market performance? An empirical investigation in the Indian context," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20457-20483, August.
    7. Ferah Yildiz & Faruk Dayi & Mustafa Yucel & Ali Cilesiz, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Criteria on Firm Value: A Strategic Analysis of the Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Haoqiang Yuan & Haiyan Luan & Xi Wang, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Rating Events on Corporate Green Technology Innovation under Sustainable Development: Perspectives Based on Informal Environmental Regulation of Social Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-26, September.
    9. Satyabrata Aich & Ayusha Thakur & Deepanjan Nanda & Sushanta Tripathy & Hee-Cheol Kim, 2021. "Factors Affecting ESG towards Impact on Investment: A Structural Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Jing Lu & Kathleen Rodenburg & Lianne Foti & Ann Pegoraro, 2022. "Are firms with better sustainability performance more resilient during crises?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3354-3370, November.
    11. Waqas Haider & Fayaz Hussain Tunio & Muhammad Usman Arshad & Paulo Jorge Silveira Ferreira, 2025. "Nexus Between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Risk Mitigation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-32, February.
    12. Paul P. Momtaz & Isabel M. Parra, 2025. "Is sustainable entrepreneurship profitable? ESG disclosure and the financial performance of SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 1535-1564, April.
    13. Diana Marieta Mihaiu & Radu-Alexandru Șerban & Alin Opreana & Mihai Țichindelean & Vasile Brătian & Liliana Barbu, 2021. "The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions and Sustainability on Company Performance in the Pharmaceutical Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Ichev, Riste & Valentinčič, Aljoša, 2025. "The effect of impact investing on performance of private firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    15. Marta Szczepańczyk & Paweł Nowodziński & Adam Sikorski, 2023. "ESG Strategy and Financial Aspects Using the Example of an Oil and Gas Midstream Company: The UNIMOT Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    17. Won-Kyu Lim & Cheong-Kyu Park, 2022. "Mandating Gender Diversity and the Value Relevance of Sustainable Development Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    18. Choi, Gahyun & Park, Kwangyeol & Yi, Eojin & Ahn, Kwangwon, 2023. "Price fairness: Clean energy stocks and the overall market," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Tan, Yeng-May & Szulczyk, Kenneth & Sii, Yew-Hei, 2023. "Performance of ESG-integrated smart beta strategies in Asia-Pacific stock markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Freundt, Jana & Lange, Andreas, 2021. "On the voluntary provision of public goods under risk," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3075-:d:1624599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.