IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3075-d1624599.html

Sustainability Reporting in the Opinion of Managers in Food Companies in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Marzena Ganc

    (Department of Finance, Institute of Economic and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—WULS, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Tomasz Felczak

    (Department of Finance, Institute of Economic and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—WULS, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Due mainly to tightened regulatory frameworks and rising stakeholder expectations, sustainability reporting has become essential to corporate governance. This study examines the perceptions of middle and senior management about sustainability reporting and the degree of implementation in Poland’s food industry. One hundred eighteen respondents from 26 food businesses participated in a poll to provide their opinions. This study examines the respondents’ awareness of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) frameworks, their understanding of sustainability reporting, and compliance with pertinent standards. The results show that the industry is becoming more conscious of sustainability reporting. However, there are still a lot of differences in how it is interpreted and applied, especially regarding the size of the organization. Compared to smaller companies, managers at larger organizations typically have a deeper understanding of ESG principles and reporting standards. The most commonly cited issues in the field under study are the complexity of reporting frameworks, a lack of knowledge of ESG reporting standards, and a lack of internal resources. Most respondents agree that sustainability reporting is crucial for enhancing a company’s reputation and maintaining long-term competitiveness in the market. This article provides recommendations for expanding educational and training programs that could help increase awareness and develop managerial skills related to sustainability in the food sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzena Ganc & Tomasz Felczak, 2025. "Sustainability Reporting in the Opinion of Managers in Food Companies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3075-:d:1624599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    2. Josef Baumüller & Karina Sopp, 2021. "Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: review, outlook and implications," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 8-28, December.
    3. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-04-2021-0114 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Dariusz Michalski, 2024. "Operationalization of ESG-Integrated Strategy Through the Balanced Scorecard in FMCG Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Carla Del Gesso & Rab Nawaz Lodhi, 2024. "Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies," Journal of Accounting Literature, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(2), pages 433-461, January.
    6. Jie Huang & Derek D. Wang & Yiying Wang, 2024. "Textual Attributes of Corporate Sustainability Reports and ESG Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Tsang, Albert & Frost, Tracie & Cao, Huijuan, 2023. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    8. Gunta Grinberga-Zalite & Andra Zvirbule, 2022. "ESG Investing Issues in Food Industry Enterprises: Focusing on On-the-Job Training in Waste Management," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Richard M. Crossley & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim, 2021. "Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3740-3762, December.
    10. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping, 2020. "The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Camelia Oprean-Stan & Ionica Oncioiu & Iulia Cristina Iuga & Sebastian Stan, 2020. "Impact of Sustainability Reporting and Inadequate Management of ESG Factors on Corporate Performance and Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    12. Liu, Yuxiang & Zhang, Jiewei & Dai, Yue, 2023. "Analyst following and greenwashing decision," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuxiang Niu & Yelin Fu & Xinlai Liu & Arjun Rachana Harish & Ming Li & George Q. Huang, 2024. "Blockchain‐based incentive mechanism for environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A principal‐agent perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 6318-6334, November.
    2. Mi Sook Lee, 2024. "The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: Moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2797-2810, June.
    3. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    5. Li, Qingyuan & Tsang, Albert & Wu, Qiong & Xiong, Xi, 2025. "ESG rating agencies and investors’ reactions to earnings news," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1).
    6. Chen, Zhixiong & Sugiyama, Kohei & Tasaka, Kazuyuki & Kito, Tomomi & Yasuda, Yukihiro, 2024. "Impact of environmental, social and governance initiatives on firm value: Analysis using AI-based ESG scores for Japanese listed firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    7. Mirela Sichigea & Laura Vasilescu & Lauren?iu Mihai & Catalina Sitnikov, 2025. "Modeling ESG Relationships with the Employability-Operational Growth-Profitability Trilogy in the European Food System," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(69), pages 329-329, April.
    8. Qin Lingda Tan & Sharizal Hashim & Zhangwei Zheng, 2025. "Environmental Social Governance (ESG) in Digitalization research: A bibliometric analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440241, January.
    9. Farah Mneimneh & Michel Kodsi & Marc Chamoun & Mohammad Basharoush & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2023. "How Can Green Energy Technology Innovations Improve the Carbon-Related Environmental Dimension of ESG Rating?," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 2183-2199, December.
    10. Mărioara Beleneși & Victoria Bogdan & Dorina Nicoleta Popa, 2021. "Disclosure Dynamics and Non-Financial Reporting Analysis. The Case of Romanian Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Abdulateif A Almulhim & Abdullah A Aljughaiman & Thamir Al Barrak & Kaouther Chebbi & Nagwa Amin, 2024. "The power of ESG in shaping dividend policy: Illuminating the role of financial sustainability in an emerging market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Zhang, Dongna & Dai, Xingyu & Wang, Qunwei, 2025. "Do green assets enhance portfolio optimization? A multi-horizon investing perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    13. Gao, Yuhang & Zhang, Mimi & Nasir, Muhammad Ali & Hao, Yan & Wu, Jinghui & Zhang, Lixiao, 2025. "ESG greenwashing behaviour in the electric vehicle supply chain: Insights from evolutionary game theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    14. Tsatsaronis, Michael & Stergiouli, Agapi & Vaggelas, George, 2025. "ESG disclosure as a proxy of port corporate communication and sustainable management strategy: An LDA approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Zeng, Xiao & Xin, Yingying & Xiang, Kai, 2025. "The spillover effect of customer annual report tone on supplier ESG decisions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Mohammad I. Jizi & Mahmoud Arayssi, 2026. "Do investors value GCC firms’ social performance?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 23-35, March.
    17. Rosalia Castellano & Gennaro Punzo & Giuseppe Scandurra & Antonio Thomas, 2022. "Exploring antecedents of innovations for small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises' environmental sustainability: An interpretative framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1730-1748, May.
    18. Zhuang, Pengtao & He, Qing & Ju, Wangjing & Xia, Qin, 2025. "How do firms react to ESG news-based sentiment? A corporate risk-taking perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Gaurav Jyoti & Ashu Khanna, 2024. "How does sustainability performance affect firms' market performance? An empirical investigation in the Indian context," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20457-20483, August.
    20. Ferah Yildiz & Faruk Dayi & Mustafa Yucel & Ali Cilesiz, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Criteria on Firm Value: A Strategic Analysis of the Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3075-:d:1624599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.