Author
Listed:
- Atif Ismail
(Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)
- Farshid Torabi
(Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)
- Saman Azadbakht
(Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)
- Faysal Ahammad
(Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)
- Qamar Yasin
(National Key Laboratory of Continental Shale Oil, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China)
- David A. Wood
(DWA Energy Limited, Lincoln LN6, UK)
- Erfan Mohammadian
(National Key Laboratory of Continental Shale Oil, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China)
Abstract
The relative permeability of a fluid plays a vital role in numerical simulation studies of multiphase flow. Several empirical models are used to estimate relative permeability, but these models are often inaccurate due to differences in the assumptions under which it is formulated. A specific model of relative permeability can significantly impact the results of a simulation, so it is essential to select the most appropriate model. This study incorporates the numerical simulation of water flooding into several well-known classical and non-linear predictive models of relative permeability. Based on the comparison of classical predictive models, the results reveal that the predictions from the classical models were more closely aligned with experimental data during the pre-water injection phase. However, after the water injection, the models overestimated the average reservoir pressure. Due to this limitation, all classical models were unable to match water-cut data accurately. In contrast, the proposed non-linear model demonstrated superior performance in matching the water-cut data. Compared to classical models, it accurately predicted water cut and reservoir performance. The proposed model developed for sandstone reservoirs was able to predict k rw (the relative permeability of water) and k ro (the relative permeability of oil) with low errors ( RMSE = 0.028 and 0.01, respectively). The R 2 values of the proposed model for k ro and k rw were 0.97 and 0.98, indicating excellent agreement with the experimental results. The proposed model also demonstrated a significant improvement in the accuracy of simulation data matching after water injection. Additionally, this model provides flexibility in parameter tuning and a solid foundation for relative permeability model development. By improving relative permeability modeling, this study enhances water flooding simulations for more efficient resource utilization and reduced environmental impact. This new approach improves the selection and development of appropriate models for numerical simulations of water flooding in sandstone reservoirs thereby enhancing predictions of reservoir performance.
Suggested Citation
Atif Ismail & Farshid Torabi & Saman Azadbakht & Faysal Ahammad & Qamar Yasin & David A. Wood & Erfan Mohammadian, 2025.
"Sustainable Reservoir Management: Simulating Water Flooding to Optimize Oil Recovery in Heterogeneous Reservoirs Through the Evaluation of Relative Permeability Models,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2526-:d:1611594
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Niu, Qinghe & Hu, Mingwei & Chang, Jiangfang & Wang, Wei & Yuan, Wei & Wang, Qizhi & Zheng, Yongxiang & Shang, Songhua, 2024.
"Explosive fracturing mechanism in low-permeability sandstone-type uranium deposits considering different acidification reactions,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
- Niu, Qinghe & Wang, Jie & He, Jiabin & Yuan, Wei & Chang, Jiangfang & Wang, Wei & Yuan, Junhong & Wang, Qizhi & Zheng, Yongxiang & Shang, Songhua, 2025.
"Evolution of pore structure, fracture morphology and permeability during CO2+O2 in-situ leaching process of fractured sandstone,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2526-:d:1611594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.