IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2352-d1607599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Mobile App Development for Sustainability: Designing and Evaluating the SBAM Design Cards

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Tancredi

    (Department of Education, Psychology and Communication, University Suor Orsola Benincasa, 80135 Naples, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Roberta Presta

    (Department of Education, Psychology and Communication, University Suor Orsola Benincasa, 80135 Naples, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Laura Mancuso

    (Department of Education, Psychology and Communication, University Suor Orsola Benincasa, 80135 Naples, Italy)

  • Roberto Montanari

    (RE:LAB Srl, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

Abstract

Behavioral changes are critical for addressing sustainability challenges, which have become increasingly urgent due to the growing impact of global greenhouse gas emissions on ecosystems and human livelihoods. However, translating awareness into meaningful action requires practical tools to bridge this gap. Mobile applications, utilizing strategies from human–computer interaction (HCI) such as gamification, nudging, and persuasive technologies, have proven to be powerful in promoting sustainable behaviors. To support designers in developing effective apps of this kind, theory-based design guidelines were created, drawing on established theories and design approaches aimed at shaping and encouraging virtuous user behaviors fostering sustainability. To make these guidelines more accessible and enhance their usability during the design phase, this study presents their transformation into the SBAM card deck, a deck of 11 design cards. The SBAM cards aim to simplify theoretical concepts, stimulate creativity, and provide structured support for design discussions, helping designers generate solutions tailored to specific project contexts. This study also evaluates the effectiveness of the SBAM cards in the design process through two workshops with design students. Results show that the cards enhance ideation, foster creativity, and improve designers’ perceived self-efficacy compared to the exploitation of the same design guidelines information presented in traditional textual formats. This paper discusses the SBAM cards design and evaluation methodology, findings, and implications, offering insights into how the SBAM design cards can bridge the gap between theory and practice in sustainability-focused mobile app development. To ensure broader accessibility, the SBAM cards have been made available to the public through a dedicated website.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Tancredi & Roberta Presta & Laura Mancuso & Roberto Montanari, 2025. "Enhancing Mobile App Development for Sustainability: Designing and Evaluating the SBAM Design Cards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2352-:d:1607599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Cellina & Dominik Bucher & José Veiga Simão & Roman Rudel & Martin Raubal, 2019. "Beyond Limitations of Current Behaviour Change Apps for Sustainable Mobility: Insights from a User-Centered Design and Evaluation Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Mariia Sozoniuk & Jonghun Park & Natalia Lumby, 2022. "Investigating Residents’ Acceptance of Mobile Apps for Household Recycling: A Case Study of New Jersey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Carmen Isensee & Frank Teuteberg & Kai Michael Griese, 2022. "Exploring the Use of Mobile Apps for Fostering Sustainability-Oriented Corporate Culture: A Qualitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    4. George Mastorakis & Ioannis Kopanakis & John Makridis & Christina Chroni & Katerina Synani & Katia Lasaridi & Konstadinos Abeliotis & Ioannis Louloudakis & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Thrassyvoulos Man, 2024. "Managing Household Food Waste with the FoodSaveShare Mobile Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thrassyvoulos Manios & Katia Lasaridi & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Konstadinos Abeliotis & Christina Chroni, 2024. "Rethinking Food Waste: Insights from the 2021 and 2022 RETASTE Conferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Francesca Cellina & Dominik Bucher & Francesca Mangili & José Veiga Simão & Roman Rudel & Martin Raubal, 2019. "A Large Scale, App-Based Behaviour Change Experiment Persuading Sustainable Mobility Patterns: Methods, Results and Lessons Learnt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Malek Al-Chalabi & David Banister, 2022. "The Missing Link? Insights from an Innovative Feedback Exercise for Household Electricity and Travel Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Emma Maier & Lewis Turner-Brown & Andrew Broadbent & Jonathan Freeman, 2025. "Attitudes, Time Pressure, and Behavior Change Techniques Affect Route Journey Planning Decisions: Evidence from an RCT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Miaomei Guo & Weilun Huang, 2023. "Consumer Willingness to Recycle The Wasted Batteries of Electric Vehicles in the Era of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Sofia-Evangelia Chachami-Chalioti & Christina Emmanouil & Dionysis Latinopoulos & Athanasios Kungolos, 2024. "Circular Economy Aspects of the New National Solid Waste Management Plan and Citizens' Engagement in Northern Greece," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 2011-2030, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2352-:d:1607599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.