Author
Listed:
- Dongyu Qi
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Yinan Sha
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Bin Li
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
Yellow River Laboratory (Henan), Zhengzhou 450018, China)
- Xupei Yao
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Manjun Li
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Xueming Du
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Xiaohua Zhao
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Kejie Zhai
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
Abstract
Urban underground infrastructure is increasingly challenged by material aging, environmental degradation, and structural deterioration. In response, trenchless polymer grouting technologies employing sustainability-oriented two-component foaming polymers have attracted growing attention. To investigate shear behavior at the polymer–concrete interface, this study conducted direct shear tests on two types of composite interface geometries—curved and planar—formed by bonding two-component foaming polymer to concrete substrates. Five polymer densities (0.33, 0.42, 0.51, 0.58, 0.66 g/cm 3 ), three concrete strengths (C20, C30, C40), three normal stress levels (0.3, 1.0, 2.0 MPa), three shear rates (0.5, 2.0, 5.0 mm/min), and three interface sizes (100, 150, 200 mm) were examined. The results show that both interface types undergo five characteristic stages under shear. Across identical parameter levels, curved interfaces consistently exhibited higher peak shear strength and larger peak displacement than planar ones. When the polymer density is identical, the peak shear strength and displacement of curved specimens are about 1.38 and 1.43 times those of planar specimens, respectively. Similarly, for specimens with the same concrete strength, normal stress, and shear rate, the corresponding ratios of peak shear strength and displacement are about 1.14 and 1.55, 1.96 and 1.43, and 1.43 and 1.36, respectively. Within the tested ranges, the shear stress increases with polymer density, concrete strength, and normal stress, and generally decreases with shear rate. The shear displacement decreases with polymer density, concrete strength, and shear rate, and generally increases with normal stress. As the specimen size increases, the peak shear strength and peak shear displacement of the curved specimens first increase and then decrease, whereas for the planar specimens, the peak shear strength exhibits a nonlinear increasing trend. These findings provide valuable insights to promote sustainable underground infrastructure rehabilitation.
Suggested Citation
Dongyu Qi & Yinan Sha & Bin Li & Xupei Yao & Manjun Li & Xueming Du & Xiaohua Zhao & Kejie Zhai, 2025.
"Shear Behavior of Curved Concrete Structures Repaired with Sustainability-Oriented Trenchless Polymer Grouting,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-17, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9340-:d:1776172
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Xiren Zhou & Shikang Liu & Xinyu Yan & Yizhan Fan & Xiangyu Wang & Yu Kang & Jian Cheng & Huanhuan Chen, 2025.
"Reservoir-enhanced segment anything model for subsurface diagnosis,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
- Xiuyu Wu & Pengkai Sun, 2024.
"Dynamic Analysis and Temporal Governance of Safety Risks: Evidence from Underground Construction Accident Reports,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9340-:d:1776172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.