IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8688-d1759313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Energy Recovery Configurations for Solar Vacuum Membrane Distillation

Author

Listed:
  • Rihab Miladi

    (Laboratory Energy, Water, Environment and Process, National Engineering School of Gabes, University of Gabes, Gabes 6029, Tunisia)

  • Bilel Hadrich

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nader Frikha

    (Laboratory Energy, Water, Environment and Process, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3038, Tunisia)

  • Slimane Gabsi

    (Laboratory Energy, Water, Environment and Process, National School of Engineering of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3038, Tunisia)

Abstract

Vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) is a promising desalination technology, which is likely to be integrated with solar energy, and offers a sustainable solution to freshwater scarcity. However, its industrial application remains limited due to high specific energy consumption and water production costs. The key to improving VMD performance lies in enhancing the recovery of the latent heat of condensation. In this investigation, four different configurations are proposed; each differs in the method of condensation and energy recovery. The first is applied by using a basic condenser, preheating seawater with latent heat from vapor. The second is implemented by incorporating a liquid ring vacuum pump (LRVP), enabling both condensation and vacuum generation. The third is performed by coupling VMD with a heat pump, which operates by using a refrigerant fluid. Lastly, the fourth is employed by using mechanical vapor compression (MVC), where the vapor is compressed to recover heat efficiently. The results show that the VMD-MVC is the most efficient configuration, offering the lowest specific energy consumption (154.6 kWh/m 3 ), the highest energy recovery rate (54.64%), the highest gained output ratio (GOR) of 5.52, and the lowest water production cost (4.6 USD/m 3 ). In contrast, the VMD system coupled with a heat pump presented the highest water production cost (36.4 USD/m 3 ) among all the evaluated configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Rihab Miladi & Bilel Hadrich & Nader Frikha & Slimane Gabsi, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Energy Recovery Configurations for Solar Vacuum Membrane Distillation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8688-:d:1759313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8688/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8688/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kawtar Rahaoui & Hamid Khayyam & Quoc Linh Ve & Aliakbar Akbarzadeh & Abhijit Date, 2021. "Renewable Thermal Energy Driven Desalination Process for a Sustainable Management of Reverse Osmosis Reject Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Mujeeb Iqbal Soomro & Sanjay Kumar & Asad Ullah & Muhammad Ali Shar & Abdulaziz Alhazaa, 2022. "Solar-Powered Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System: Performance and Water Cost Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekaterina Sokolova & Khashayar Sadeghi & Seyed Hadi Ghazaie & Dario Barsi & Francesca Satta & Pietro Zunino, 2022. "Feasibility of Hybrid Desalination Plants Coupled with Small Gas Turbine CHP Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8688-:d:1759313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.