IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7904-d1740727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soundtalking: Extending Soundscape Practice Through Long-Term Participant-Led Sound Activities in the Dee Estuary

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Spencer Bruce

    (School of Digital Arts (SODA), Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BX, UK)

Abstract

This study explores the practice of “soundtalking”, a novel method of participant-led sound practice, across the Dee Estuary in the UK. Over the course of twelve months, the Our Dee Estuary Project facilitated monthly meetings where participants engaged in sound workshops, in-depth discussions, and sound-making activities, with the aim of fostering a deeper connection with both their local and sonic environments. This longitudinal practice-based research study created an environment of sonic learning and listening development, documenting how participants’ interactions and narratives both shape and are shaped by the estuarial environment, its soundscape, and their sense of place. Participant-led conversations formed the basis of the methodology, providing rich qualitative data on how individuals perceive, interpret, and interact with their surroundings and the impact that the soundscape has on the individual. The regular and unstructured discussions revealed the intrinsic value of soundscapes in participants’ lives, emphasising themes of memory, reflection, place attachment, environmental awareness, and well-being. The collaborative nature of the project allowed for the co-creation of a film and a radio soundscape, both of which serve as significant outputs, encapsulating the auditory and emotional essence of the estuary. The study’s initial findings indicate that “soundtalking” as a practice not only enhances participants’ auditory perception but also fosters a sense of community and belonging. The regularity of monthly meetings facilitated the development of a shared acoustic vocabulary and experience among participants, which in turn enriched their collective and individual experiences of the estuary. Soundtalking is proposed as an additional tool in the study of soundscapes to complement and extend more commonly implemented methods, such as soundwalking and soundsitting. Soundtalking demonstrates the efficacy of longitudinal, participant-led approaches in capturing the dynamic and lived experiences of soundscapes and their associated environments, over methods that only create fleeting short-term engagements with the soundscape. In conclusion, the Our Dee Estuary Project demonstrates the transformative potential of soundtalking in deepening our understanding of human–environment interactions and, in addition, has shown that there are both health and well-being aspects that arise from the practice. Beyond this, the project has output a film and a radio sound piece, which not only document but also celebrate the intricate and evolving relationship between the participants and the estuarine soundscape, offering valuable insights for future soundscape research and community engagement initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Spencer Bruce, 2025. "Soundtalking: Extending Soundscape Practice Through Long-Term Participant-Led Sound Activities in the Dee Estuary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7904-:d:1740727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah R. Payne & Neil Bruce, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Urban Quiet Areas and Perceived Restorative Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Simone Torresin & Francesco Aletta & Francesco Babich & Ethan Bourdeau & Jack Harvie-Clark & Jian Kang & Lisa Lavia & Antonella Radicchi & Rossano Albatici, 2020. "Acoustics for Supportive and Healthy Buildings: Emerging Themes on Indoor Soundscape Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Trace Gale & Andrea Ednie & Karen Beeftink & Andrea Báez Montenegro, 2025. "Soundscapes as Conservation Tools: Integrating Visitor Engagement in Biodiversity Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Katarina Kristianova & Natalia Małkowska & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Xinhui Fei & Yanqin Zhang & Deyi Kong & Qitang Huang & Minhua Wang & Jianwen Dong, 2023. "Quantitative Model Study of the Psychological Recovery Benefit of Landscape Environment Based on Eye Movement Tracking Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Trudeau, Christopher & King, Nicholas & Guastavino, Catherine, 2023. "Investigating sonic injustice: A review of published research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    5. Krzysztof Nering & Alicja Kowalska-Koczwara & Krzysztof Stypuła, 2020. "Annoyance Based Vibro-Acoustic Comfort Evaluation of as Summation of Stimuli Annoyance in the Context of Human Exposure to Noise and Vibration in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Shilun Zhang & Xiaolong Zhao & Zixi Zeng & Xuan Qiu, 2019. "The Influence of Audio-Visual Interactions on Psychological Responses of Young People in Urban Green Areas: A Case Study in Two Parks in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Francesco Aletta & Jian Kang, 2019. "Promoting Healthy and Supportive Acoustic Environments: Going beyond the Quietness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-4, December.
    8. Jieling Xiao & Francesco Aletta & Islah Ali-Maclachlan, 2022. "On the Opportunities of the Soundscape Approach to Revitalise Acoustics Training in Undergraduate Architectural Courses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, February.
    9. Marina Eirini Stamatiadou & Iordanis Thoidis & Nikolaos Vryzas & Lazaros Vrysis & Charalampos Dimoulas, 2021. "Semantic Crowdsourcing of Soundscapes Heritage: A Mojo Model for Data-Driven Storytelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Lawal M. Marafa & Zhe Wang & Felix K. H. Tsang, 2022. "Tranquillity in Urban Classical Chinese Gardens and Modern Parks: The Effect of Natural and Contextual Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Patrycja Adamczyk & Martyna Andrzejewska & Sebastian Bernat, 2024. "Spatial Analyses in the Planning of Quiet Areas: A Case Study of Radom and Lublin (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Antonio Laurìa & Simone Secchi & Luigi Vessella, 2020. "Acoustic Comfort as a Salutogenic Resource in Learning Environments—A Proposal for the Design of a System to Improve the Acoustic Quality of Classrooms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7904-:d:1740727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.