IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7825-d1738347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Reinforced Concrete Columns Embedded with PET Bottles Under Axial Compression

Author

Listed:
  • Sadiq Al Bayati

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Sami W. Tabsh

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

This study explores the potential use of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles as void makers in short reinforced concrete columns under pure axial compression. Such a scheme promotes sustainability by decreasing the consumption of concrete and reducing the pollution that comes with the disposal of PET bottles. The experimental component of this study consisted of testing 16 reinforced concrete columns divided into two groups, based on the cross-section dimensions. One group contained eight columns of a length of 900 mm with a net cross-sectional area of about 40,000 mm 2 , while the second group contained eight columns of a length of 1100 mm with a net cross-sectional area of about 62,500 mm 2 . The diameter of the void within the small cross-section group was 100 mm and within the large cross-section group was 265 mm. The experimental program includes pairs of solid and corresponding void specimens with consideration of the size of the longitudinal steel reinforcement, lateral tie spacing, and concrete compressive strength. The tests are conducted using a universal test machine under displacement-controlled loading conditions with the help of strain gauges and Linear Variable differential transformers (LVDTs). The analysis of the test results showed that the columns that were embedded with a small void that occupied about 30% of the core area exhibited reductions of 9% in the ultimate capacity, 14% in initial stiffness, 20% in ductility, and 1% in residual strength. On the other hand, the columns that contained a large void occupying about 60% of the core area demonstrated reductions of 24% in the ultimate capacity, 34% in initial stiffness, and 26% in ductility, although the residual strength was slightly increased by 5%. The reason for the deficiency in the structural response in the latter case is because the void occupied a significant fraction of the concrete core. The theoretical part of this study showed that the ACI 318 code provisions can reasonably predict the uniaxial compressive strength of columns embedded with PET bottles if the void does not occupy more than 30% of the concrete core. This study confirmed that short columns embedded with relatively small voids made from PET bottles and subjected to pure axial compression create a balance between sustainability benefits and a structural performance tradeoff.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadiq Al Bayati & Sami W. Tabsh, 2025. "Response of Reinforced Concrete Columns Embedded with PET Bottles Under Axial Compression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7825-:d:1738347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7825/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7825/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moustafa Abdulrahim Mohamedsalih & Ahmed E. Radwan & Saleh H. Alyami & Ahmed K. Abd El Aal, 2024. "The Use of Plastic Waste as Replacement of Coarse Aggregate in Concrete Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Tanut Waroonkun & Tanapong Puangpinyo & Yuttana Tongtuam, 2017. "The Development of a Concrete Block Containing PET Plastic Bottle Flakes," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 186-186, October.
    3. Adewumi John Babafemi & Branko Šavija & Suvash Chandra Paul & Vivi Anggraini, 2018. "Engineering Properties of Concrete with Waste Recycled Plastic: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adewumi John Babafemi & Nina Sirba & Suvash Chandra Paul & Md Jihad Miah, 2022. "Mechanical and Durability Assessment of Recycled Waste Plastic (Resin8 & PET) Eco-Aggregate Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Sean Jamieson & Greg White & Luke Verstraten, 2024. "Principles for Incorporating Recycled Materials into Airport Pavement Construction for More Sustainable Airport Pavements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Ichiro Tsuchimoto & Yuya Kajikawa, 2022. "Recycling of Plastic Waste: A Systematic Review Using Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-39, December.
    4. Khawar Ali & Panumas Saingam & Muhammad Irshad Qureshi & Shahzad Saleem & Adnan Nawaz & Tahir Mehmood & Ahsen Maqsoom & Muhammad Waqas Malik & Suniti Suparp, 2023. "Influence of Recycled Plastic Incorporation as Coarse Aggregates on Concrete Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Malgorzata Ulewicz & Jakub Jura & Adam Gnatowski, 2024. "Cement Mortars Based on Polyamide Waste Modified with Fly Ash from Biomass Combustion—A New Material for Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Liliana Lizárraga-Mendiola & Luis D. López-León & Gabriela A. Vázquez-Rodríguez, 2022. "Municipal Solid Waste as a Substitute for Virgin Materials in the Construction Industry: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Simona Marinelli & Samuele Marinello & Francesco Lolli & Rita Gamberini & Antonio Maria Coruzzolo, 2023. "Waste Plastic and Rubber in Concrete and Cement Mortar: A Tertiary Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Wenqiang Xing & Zhihe Cheng & Xianzhang Ling & Liang Tang & Shengyi Cong & Shaowei Wei & Lin Geng, 2022. "Bearing Properties and Stability Analysis of the Slope Protection Framework Using Recycled Railway Sleepers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-11, April.
    9. Mohamed Meftah Ben Zair & Fauzan Mohd Jakarni & Ratnasamy Muniandy & Salihudin Hassim, 2021. "A Brief Review: Application of Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate in Asphalt Pavement Reinforcement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Bala Rama Krishna Chunchu & Jagadeesh Putta, 2019. "Effect of Recycled Plastic Granules as a Partial Substitute for Natural Resource Sand on the Durability of SCC," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Fahad K. Alqahtani & Ibrahim S. Abotaleb & Sara Harb, 2021. "LEED Study of Green Lightweight Aggregates in Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Syed Nasir Abbas & Muhammad Irshad Qureshi & Malik Muneeb Abid & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq & Anne Wai Man Ng, 2022. "An Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Concrete by Applying Sand Coating on Recycled High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) and Electronic-Wastes (E-Wastes) Used as a Partial Replacement of Natural Co," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Alessandra Bonoli & Sara Zanni & Francisco Serrano-Bernardo, 2021. "Sustainability in Building and Construction within the Framework of Circular Cities and European New Green Deal. The Contribution of Concrete Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Saimin Huang & Hongchang Wang & Waqas Ahmad & Ayaz Ahmad & Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin & Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed & Ahmed Farouk Deifalla & Imran Mehmood, 2022. "Plastic Waste Management Strategies and Their Environmental Aspects: A Scientometric Analysis and Comprehensive Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-31, April.
    15. Mazen A. Al-Sinan & Abdulaziz A. Bubshait, 2022. "Using Plastic Sand as a Construction Material toward a Circular Economy: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7825-:d:1738347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.