IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7825-d1738347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Reinforced Concrete Columns Embedded with PET Bottles Under Axial Compression

Author

Listed:
  • Sadiq Al Bayati

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Sami W. Tabsh

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

This study explores the potential use of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles as void makers in short reinforced concrete columns under pure axial compression. Such a scheme promotes sustainability by decreasing the consumption of concrete and reducing the pollution that comes with the disposal of PET bottles. The experimental component of this study consisted of testing 16 reinforced concrete columns divided into two groups, based on the cross-section dimensions. One group contained eight columns of a length of 900 mm with a net cross-sectional area of about 40,000 mm 2 , while the second group contained eight columns of a length of 1100 mm with a net cross-sectional area of about 62,500 mm 2 . The diameter of the void within the small cross-section group was 100 mm and within the large cross-section group was 265 mm. The experimental program includes pairs of solid and corresponding void specimens with consideration of the size of the longitudinal steel reinforcement, lateral tie spacing, and concrete compressive strength. The tests are conducted using a universal test machine under displacement-controlled loading conditions with the help of strain gauges and Linear Variable differential transformers (LVDTs). The analysis of the test results showed that the columns that were embedded with a small void that occupied about 35% of the core area exhibited reductions of 9% in the ultimate capacity, 14% in initial stiffness, 20% in ductility, and 1% in residual strength. On the other hand, the columns that contained a large void occupying about 60% of the core area demonstrated reductions of 24% in the ultimate capacity, 34% in initial stiffness, and 26% in ductility, although the residual strength was slightly increased by 5%. The reason for the deficiency in the structural response in the latter case is because the void occupied a significant fraction of the concrete core. The theoretical part of this study showed that the ACI 318 code provisions can reasonably predict the uniaxial compressive strength of columns embedded with PET bottles if the void does not occupy more than 30% of the concrete core. This study confirmed that short columns embedded with relatively small voids made from PET bottles and subjected to pure axial compression create a balance between sustainability benefits and a structural performance tradeoff.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadiq Al Bayati & Sami W. Tabsh, 2025. "Response of Reinforced Concrete Columns Embedded with PET Bottles Under Axial Compression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7825-:d:1738347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7825/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7825/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7825-:d:1738347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.