IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6845-d1711585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Sustainability-Oriented Assessment of Noise Impacts on University Dormitories: Field Measurements, Student Survey, and Modeling Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoying Wen

    (Department of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Shikang Zhou

    (Department of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Kainan Zhang

    (Department of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Jianmin Wang

    (Department of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Dongye Zhao

    (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-1324, USA)

Abstract

Ensuring a sustainable and healthy human environment in university dormitories is essential for students’ learning, living, and overall health and well-being. To address this need, we carried out a series of systematic field measurements of the noise levels at 30 dormitories in three representative major urban universities in a major provincial capital city in China and designed and implemented a comprehensive questionnaire and surveyed 1005 students about their perceptions of their acoustic environment. We proposed and applied a sustainability–health-oriented, multidimensional assessment framework to assess the acoustic environment of the dormitories and student responses to natural sound, technological sounds, and human-made sounds. Using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach combined with the field measurements and student surveys, we identified three categories and six factors on student health and well-being for assessing the acoustic environment of university dormitories. The field data indicated that noise levels at most of the measurement points exceeded the recommended or regulatory thresholds. Higher noise impacts were observed in early mornings and evenings, primarily due to traffic noise and indoor activities. Natural sounds (e.g., wind, birdsong, water flow) were highly valued by students for their positive effect on the students’ pleasantness and satisfaction. Conversely, human and technological sounds (traffic noise, construction noise, and indoor noise from student activities) were deemed highly disturbing. Gender differences were evident in the assessment of the acoustic environment, with male students generally reporting higher levels of the pleasantness and preference for natural sounds compared to female students. Educational backgrounds showed no significant influence on sound perceptions. The findings highlight the need for providing actionable guidelines for dormitory ecological design, such as integrating vertical greening in dormitory design, water features, and biodiversity planting to introduce natural soundscapes, in parallel with developing campus activity standards and lifestyle during noise-sensitive periods. The multidimensional assessment framework will drive a sustainable human–ecology–sound symbiosis in university dormitories, and the category and factor scales to be employed and actions to improve the level of student health and well-being, thus, providing a reference for both research and practice for sustainable cities and communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoying Wen & Shikang Zhou & Kainan Zhang & Jianmin Wang & Dongye Zhao, 2025. "A Sustainability-Oriented Assessment of Noise Impacts on University Dormitories: Field Measurements, Student Survey, and Modeling Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6845-:d:1711585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6845/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6845/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6845-:d:1711585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.