IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p9977-d1177425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Measurements and Human Perception to Remediate Noise Pollution in the Urban Public Parks in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Saleem S. AlSaleem

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulbasit Almhafdy

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Planning, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia)

  • Umberto Berardi

    (Department of Architectural Science, Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, 325 Church Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Amal A. Al-Shargabi

    (Department of Information Technology, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahmed AbdelMonteleb M. Ali

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Planning, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt)

Abstract

The deleterious effects of noise pollution on public health have been well documented, with traffic noise being identified as a significant contributor to stress and adverse impacts on the human body and mind. In this study, sound levels at 12 different points in Al-Oqailat Park in Buraydah, Saudi Arabia, were measured using a sound level meter (SLM), with the study’s primary objective being to conduct this measurement. The experimental results were then compared with perception measurements collected from users who frequently visited Al-Oqailat park. Sound measurements were taken in four different zones (A, B, C, and D) during rush hours between 1:30 p.m. and 5:20 p.m. It was found that noise levels at point A1 peaked at 79 dBA at 4:40 p.m., while the lowest level recorded was 41.1 dBA at point D2 at 2:35 p.m. The range of noise levels varied between 79 and 41 dBA, with a rate of decline of 48.10%. Zones A and B seemed to have the highest noise levels during rush hours, since they were located closest to King Fahd Road and Al-Adl Street, while zone D exhibited the lowest noise levels due to its location as a parking lot for Buraydah Court. An intermediate noise level was found in zone C, in the middle of Al-Oqailat park. The people perception results, completed by 84 park visitors, showed that zone A was identified as having exceptionally high noise levels compared to the other zones, with zone D having the lowest levels. These results were consistent with the experimental findings and reflected that the points along King Fahd Road and Al-Adl Street had the highest noise levels. Overall, the research highlighted the dominance of car traffic and horns as the primary sources of noise pollution in and around Al-Oqailat Park, emphasizing the significance of meticulous site selection for parks in urban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Saleem S. AlSaleem & Abdulbasit Almhafdy & Umberto Berardi & Amal A. Al-Shargabi & Ahmed AbdelMonteleb M. Ali, 2023. "Field Measurements and Human Perception to Remediate Noise Pollution in the Urban Public Parks in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9977-:d:1177425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9977/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9977/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charlotte Clark & Katarina Paunovic, 2018. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Quality of Life, Wellbeing and Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Hongbin Dai & Guangqiu Huang & Jingjing Wang & Huibin Zeng & Fangyu Zhou, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of PM 2.5 Concentrations in China Based on Multiple Sources of Data and LUR-GBM during 2016–2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Mohamed A. Zytoon, 2016. "Opportunities for Environmental Noise Mapping in Saudi Arabia: A Case of Traffic Noise Annoyance in an Urban Area in Jeddah City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Owen Douglas & Enda Murphy, 2020. "Assessing the Treatment of Potential Effect Modifiers Informing World Health Organisation Guidelines for Environmental Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Davide Petri & Gaetano Licitra & Maria Angela Vigotti & Luca Fredianelli, 2021. "Effects of Exposure to Road, Railway, Airport and Recreational Noise on Blood Pressure and Hypertension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher, 2019. "Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Birth Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Sha Li & Daniel Yee Tak Fong & Sarah Lai Yin Wan & Bradley McPherson & Esther Yuet Ying Lau & Lixi Huang & Mary Sau Man Ip & Janet Yuen Ha Wong, 2021. "A Short Form of the Chinese Version of the Weinstein Noise Sensitivity Scale through Optimal Test Assembly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
    5. Xiaoying Wen & Shikang Zhou & Kainan Zhang & Jianmin Wang & Dongye Zhao, 2025. "A Sustainability-Oriented Assessment of Noise Impacts on University Dormitories: Field Measurements, Student Survey, and Modeling Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Charlotte Clark & Clare Crumpler & Hilary Notley, 2020. "Evidence for Environmental Noise Effects on Health for the United Kingdom Policy Context: A Systematic Review of the Effects of Environmental Noise on Mental Health, Wellbeing, Quality of Life, Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-34, January.
    7. Valentin Simoncic & Séverine Deguen & Christophe Enaux & Stéphanie Vandentorren & Wahida Kihal-Talantikite, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Social Inequalities and Pregnancy Outcome—Identification of Relevant Pathways and Mechanisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-43, December.
    8. Agnieszka Rosciszewska & Maciej Buszkiewicz & Gabriela Dobrzynska-Kobylec & Anna Klichowska & Tomasz Przybyla & Blanka B. Nagy & Andrzej Wicher & Michal Klichowski, 2025. "Cognitive neuroscience approach to explore the impact of wind turbine noise on various mental functions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Luis Hermida & Ignacio Pavón & Antonio Carlos Lobo Soares & J. Luis Bento-Coelho, 2019. "On the Person-Place Interaction and Its Relationship with the Responses/Outcomes of Listeners of Urban Soundscape (Compared Cases of Lisbon and Bogotá): Contextual and Semiotic Aspects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Luca Pulvirenti & Luigi Tresca & Luciano Rolando & Federico Millo, 2023. "Eco-Driving Optimization Based on Variable Grid Dynamic Programming and Vehicle Connectivity in a Real-World Scenario," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Hong Song & Yuhang Dong & Jiayu Yang & Xin Zhang & Xingxin Nie & Yuesheng Fan, 2023. "Concentration Characteristics and Correlations with Other Pollutants of Atmospheric Particulate Matter as Affected by Relevant Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Maud Dohmen & Ella Braat-Eggen & Astrid Kemperman & Maarten Hornikx, 2022. "The Effects of Noise on Cognitive Performance and Helplessness in Childhood: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Christian A. Mikutta & Charlotte Pervilhac & Hansjörg Znoj & Andrea Federspiel & Thomas J. Müller, 2022. "The Impact of Foehn Wind on Mental Distress among Patients in a Swiss Psychiatric Hospital," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Antonio J. Torija & Charlotte Clark, 2021. "A Psychoacoustic Approach to Building Knowledge about Human Response to Noise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Falah A. Aldahmashi & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Ahmed H. Abdou & Mahmoud I. Saleh & Mohamed Y. Helal & Daniel Alemshet Gebreslassie & Amany E. Salem & Salaheldeen H. Radwan, 2023. "Managing Airline Emissions, Noise, and Bird Strikes: Passengers’ Perspectives on Airlines’ Extrinsic and Intrinsic Environmental Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Md. Mostafizur Rahman & Farah Tasnim & Masrur Abdul Quader & Md. Nafee-Ul-Islam Bhuiyan & Mohammed Sadman Sakib & Rawnok Tabassum & Ifta Alam Shobuj & Lamia Hasan & Musabber Ali Chisty & Farzana Rahma, 2022. "Perceived Noise Pollution and Self-Reported Health Status among Adult Population of Bangladesh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-11, February.
    17. Qikang Zhong & Tian Dong, 2024. "Mechanistic study of the effects of perceived community environment, high-intensity physical activity and public depressive status," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Kateryna B. Fuks & Claudia Wigmann & Hicran Altug & Tamara Schikowski, 2019. "Road Traffic Noise at the Residence, Annoyance, and Cognitive Function in Elderly Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
    19. Marcin Jarnut & Jacek Kaniewski & Mariusz Buciakowski, 2025. "Review on Noise Generation Issues and Noise Mitigation Methods in Electric Vehicle Charging Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Melanie Schubert & Janice Hegewald & Alice Freiberg & Karla Romero Starke & Franziska Augustin & Steffi G. Riedel-Heller & Hajo Zeeb & Andreas Seidler, 2019. "Behavioral and Emotional Disorders and Transportation Noise among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9977-:d:1177425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.