IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6759-d1709395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Circular Economy Choices: The Role of the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Author

Listed:
  • Víctor Fernández Ocamica

    (Fundación CIRCE, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda. Ranillas 3D, 1ª Planta, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • David Zambrana-Vasquez

    (Fundación CIRCE, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda. Ranillas 3D, 1ª Planta, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • José Carlos Díaz Murillo

    (Fundación CIRCE, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda. Ranillas 3D, 1ª Planta, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

This study investigates the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a decision-support mechanism for managing complex sustainability issues in industrial settings, specifically within the framework of circular economy principles. Focusing on a case from the brewery sector, developed under the EU ECOFACT initiative, this research evaluates ten distinct configurations for the must cooling process. These alternatives are assessed using environmental, economic, and technical criteria, drawing on data from life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies. The findings indicate that selecting an optimal scenario involves balancing trade-offs among electricity and water consumption, operational efficiency, and overall environmental impacts. Notably, Scenario 3 emerges as the most balanced option, consistently demonstrating superior performance across the primary evaluation criteria. The use of AHP in this context proves valuable by introducing structure and transparency to a multifaceted decision-making process where quantitative metrics and sustainability objectives intersect. By integrating empirical industrial data with an established multi-criteria decision approach, this study highlights both the practical utility and existing limitations of conventional AHP, particularly its diminished ability to discriminate between alternatives when their scores are closely aligned. These insights suggest that hybrid or advanced AHP methodologies may be necessary to facilitate more nuanced decision-making for circular economy transitions in industrial environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Víctor Fernández Ocamica & David Zambrana-Vasquez & José Carlos Díaz Murillo, 2025. "Optimizing Circular Economy Choices: The Role of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6759-:d:1709395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6759/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6759/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ömer Apaydin & Gül Sümeyra Akçay Han, 2023. "Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Collection Methods Focusing on Zero-Waste Management Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Ramanathan, R., 1997. "Stochastic decision making using multiplicative AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 543-549, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José María Moreno-Jiménez & Manuel Salvador & Pilar Gargallo & Alfredo Altuzarra, 2016. "Systemic decision making in AHP: a Bayesian approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 261-284, October.
    2. Hahn, Eugene D., 2006. "Link function selection in stochastic multicriteria decision making models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 86-100, July.
    3. Aguaron, Juan & Moreno-Jimenez, Jose Maria, 2003. "The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 137-145, May.
    4. E D Hahn & C L Knott, 2008. "Assessing quality improvement initiatives when expert judgements are uncertain," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 252-258, February.
    5. Ömer Apaydın, 2025. "Analysis of Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management Alternatives Based on Source Separation Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-35, April.
    6. Michael Bruhn Barfod & Robin van den Honert & Kim Bang Salling, 2016. "Modeling Group Perceptions Using Stochastic Simulation: Scaling Issues in the Multiplicative AHP," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 453-474, March.
    7. Napat Harnpornchai & Wiriyaporn Wonggattaleekam, 2021. "An Application of Neutrosophic Set to Relative Importance Assignment in AHP," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Barfod, Michael Bruhn, 2012. "An MCDA approach for the selection of bike projects based on structuring and appraising activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 810-818.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6759-:d:1709395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.