IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5872-d1687786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Assessment of Gasifier Cookstove Performance on Smallholder Farms in Three Regions in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • James Kinyua Gitau

    (Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Nairobi P.O. Box 30677-00100, Kenya)

  • Cecilia Sundberg

    (Department of Energy and Technology, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Ruth Mendum

    (Office of International Programs, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 106 Agricultural Administration Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Mary Njenga

    (Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Nairobi P.O. Box 30677-00100, Kenya
    Wangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 2905-0065, Kenya)

Abstract

A majority of households in sub-Saharan Africa use inefficient biomass stoves in poorly ventilated kitchens, leading to indoor air pollution. Biomass for cooking can be sustainably sourced from agricultural residues such as prunings from agroforestry. This study assessed biochar-producing gasifier cookstove performance among 150 households in Embu, Kwale, and Siaya Counties through household surveys and participatory cooking tests with 75 households. With the gasifier, carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations were lower in Embu (5.1 ppm), while carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) were lower in Kwale, at 588 ppm and 136 μg/m 3 , respectively. Compared to the three-stone open fire, reductions in CO and PM 2.5 concentrations were highest in Embu, at 82% and 97%, respectively. The biomass-to-char conversion efficiency with the gasifier was 17–18%. If households consider the produced char as a soil amendment, they could save 24–43% of fuel compared to the three-stone open fire; if the char is seen as fuel, the potential savings are 42–65%. Significant differences between the three sites were observed with the gasifier for gross and net fuel use, and for concentrations of PM 2.5 and CO 2 . Gasifier uptake can reduce the need for fuel collection and indoor air pollution, with a positive impact on both the environment and human wellbeing.

Suggested Citation

  • James Kinyua Gitau & Cecilia Sundberg & Ruth Mendum & Mary Njenga, 2025. "Comparative Assessment of Gasifier Cookstove Performance on Smallholder Farms in Three Regions in Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5872-:d:1687786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5872/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5872/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cecilia Sundberg & Erik Karltun & James K. Gitau & Thomas Kätterer & Geoffrey M. Kimutai & Yahia Mahmoud & Mary Njenga & Gert Nyberg & Kristina Roing de Nowina & Dries Roobroeck & Petra Sieber, 2020. "Biochar from cookstoves reduces greenhouse gas emissions from smallholder farms in Africa," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 953-967, August.
    2. James K. Gitau & Cecilia Sundberg & Ruth Mendum & Jane Mutune & Mary Njenga, 2019. "Use of Biochar-Producing Gasifier Cookstove Improves Energy Use Efficiency and Indoor Air Quality in Rural Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengqiang Wei & Yiping Lu & Wei Yang & Yubin Ke & Haibiao Zheng & Lingbo Zhu & Jianfei Tong & Longwei Mei & Shinian Fu & Congju Yao, 2022. "Comparative Research on Ventilation Characteristics of Scattering and Sample Room from Chinese Spallation Neutron Source," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Elías Hurtado Pérez & Oscar Mulumba Ilunga & David Alfonso Solar & María Cristina Moros Gómez & Paula Bastida-Molina, 2020. "Sustainable Cooking Based on a 3 kW Air-Forced Multifuel Gasification Stove Using Alternative Fuels Obtained from Agricultural Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Sita Kone & Aminata Balde & Pam Zahonogo & Safietou Sanfo, 2024. "A systematic review of recent estimations of climate change impact on agriculture and adaptation strategies perspectives in Africa," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Prince Anthony Okoro & Katie Chong & Mirjam Röder, 2024. "Bioenergy potential in Nigeria, how to advance knowledge and deployment to enable SDG 7," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5872-:d:1687786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.