IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5611-d1681858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Durability Performance of Alkali-Activated Natural Pozzolan and Limestone Powder Mortar in Sulfate Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Adeshina Adewale Adewumi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin 39524, Saudi Arabia)

  • Babatunde Abiodun Salami

    (Cardiff School of Management, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Llandaff Campus, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK)

  • Mohd Azreen Bin Mohd Ariffin

    (Forensic Engineering Centre (FEC), Institute for Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction (ISIIC), Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Moruf Olalekan Yusuf

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin 39524, Saudi Arabia)

  • Khaled A. Alawi Al-Sodani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin 39524, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Ibrahim

    (Applied Research Center for Metrology, Standards and Testing, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The pressing need for sustainable construction materials has identified alkali-activated materials (AAMs) as eco-friendly alternatives to conventional Portland cement. This study explores the synergistic performance of alkaline-activated natural pozzolan and limestone powder (AANL) blends against sulfate attack, evaluating mortar specimens immersed in sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and a combined sulfate solution over 12 months. The samples were synthesized using natural pozzolan (NP) and limestone powder (LSP) in three distinct binder combinations to evaluate the influence of varying precursor ratios on the material’s performance, as follows: NP: LSP = 40:60 (AN 40 L 60 ), 50:50 (AN 50 L 50 ), and 60:40 (AN 60 L 40 ). At the same time, the alkaline activators of 10 M NaOH (aq) and Na₂SiO 3(aq) were combined in a ratio of 1:1 and cured at 75 °C. The research examines the weight variations of the samples, their residual compressive strength, and microstructural characteristics under exposure to magnesium sulfate, sodium sulfate, and a combined sulfate solution. In terms of weight change, samples exposed to Na 2 SO 4 gained weight slightly, with AN 40 L 60 recording the highest gain (3.2%) due to the ingress of sulfate ions and pore filling. Under MgSO 4 , AN 60 L 40 had the lowest weight gain (29%), while AN 40 L 60 reached 54%. In mixed sulfate, AN 60 L 40 showed negligible weight gain (0.11%); whereas, AN 50 L 50 and AN 40 L 60 gained 2.43% and 1.81%, respectively. Compressive strength retention after one year indicated that mixes with higher NP content fared better. AN 60 L 40 exhibited the highest residual strength across all solutions—16.12 MPa in Na 2 SO 4 , 12.5 MPa in MgSO 4 , and 19.45 MPa in the mixed solution. Conversely, AN 40 L 60 showed the highest strength degradation, losing 47.22%, 58.11%, and 55.89%, respectively. SEM-EDS and FTIR analyses confirm that LSP’s vulnerability to sulfate attack diminishes with increased NP incorporation, highlighting a synergistic interaction that mitigates degradation and retains structural integrity. The combination of 60% NP and 40% LSP demonstrated superior resistance to all sulfate environments, as evidenced by visual durability, minimized weight gain, and retained compressive strength. This study highlights the potential of tailored NP-LSP combinations in developing durable and sustainable AAMs, paving the way for innovative solutions in sulfate-prone environments, while reducing environmental impact and promoting economic efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeshina Adewale Adewumi & Babatunde Abiodun Salami & Mohd Azreen Bin Mohd Ariffin & Moruf Olalekan Yusuf & Khaled A. Alawi Al-Sodani & Mohammed Ibrahim, 2025. "Durability Performance of Alkali-Activated Natural Pozzolan and Limestone Powder Mortar in Sulfate Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5611-:d:1681858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5611-:d:1681858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.