Author
Listed:
- Alia Wokan
(Department of Sustainable Development and Environmental Engineering, University of Life Sciences ”King Mihai I” of Timișoara, 119 Calea Aradului Street, 300645 Timișoara, Romania)
- Mădălina Iordache
(Department of Sustainable Development and Environmental Engineering, University of Life Sciences ”King Mihai I” of Timișoara, 119 Calea Aradului Street, 300645 Timișoara, Romania
Research Centre of Bioresources, Environment and Geospatial Data, University of Life Sciences ”King Mihai I” of Timișoara, 119 Calea Aradului Street, 300645 Timișoara, Romania)
Abstract
This study was conducted in an urban park in a temperate-continental city of Europe (Timișoara, Romania) and aimed to investigate the contribution of urban vegetation in maintaining air quality and mitigating the heat in the analyzed city. The following air parameters were monitored: fine particulate matter PM 2.5 , coarse particulate matter PM 10 , AQI (Air Quality Index) (resulted from PM 2.5 and PM 10 ), particle number, air temperature, relative air humidity, TVOC (total volatile organic compounds), and HCHO (formaldehyde). The results of this study show that urban vegetation remains a reliable factor in reducing PM 2.5 and PM 10 in city air and in keeping the AQI within the limits corresponding to good air quality, but also that relative air humidity counteracts the contribution of vegetation in achieving this goal. Inside the park, the HCHO concentration increased by up to 4–5 times compared to the outside, and this increase was not caused by vehicle traffic but rather by the photochemical reactions generating HCHO. Regarding the cooling effect on air temperature, the studied green space did not exhibit this effect, as the air temperature inside it increased by up to 1–6 °C compared to the outside. Our results contrast with the general perception that urban parks and green spaces are cooler islands within the cities and draw attention to the fact that having a green space in a city does not necessarily mean achieving environmental goals, such as reducing the heat risk of cities. Based on the results, we consider that the main limitations in achieving these objectives were the park’s small size (88 hectares) and its morphology and architecture resulting from the integration of the species that compose it. It follows from these data that it is not enough for an urban green space to be established, but its design must be combined with urban morphology strategies if the heat mitigation effect is to be achieved and the cooling benefits are to be maximized in cities.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5564-:d:1680925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.