Author
Listed:
- Abdelmageed Atef
(Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, Tsu 514-0102, Japan)
- Zakaria Hossain
(Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, Tsu 514-0102, Japan)
Abstract
The disposal of rice husk ash (RHA) in rice-producing regions poses critical environmental and public health challenges. However, RHA’s high amorphous silica content offers significant potential for soil stabilization, particularly in improving the mechanical properties of weak soils. This study investigates the shear strength of clay soil stabilized with rice husk ash (2%, 4%, 6%) and low cement dosages (2%, 4%, 6%) that incorporate layered subgrade systems (top, bottom, and dual-layer configurations). By optimizing rice husk ash incorporation with reduced cement content, this approach challenges conventional stabilization methods that rely heavily on cement. Sixteen soil-cement-RHA mixtures were evaluated through mechanical testing, supplemented by microstructural and elemental analyses using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Results demonstrated substantial improvements in shear strength across all subgrade layers. The dual-layer system with 2% RHA 6% cement (2%RHA6%C) achieved the highest cohesive strength (115 kN/m 2 ) and maximum deviatoric stress (446 kN/m 2 ). These findings highlight the viability of RHA as a sustainable, low-cement soil stabilizer, offering dual benefits: effective waste valorization and enhanced geotechnical performance. This study advances sustainable ground engineering practices by introducing a resource-efficient novel building material and provides a framework for layered stabilization systems in clay soils. Future investigations will focus on a broader range of soil types and extend the application of this approach to other sustainable ground engineering practices.
Suggested Citation
Abdelmageed Atef & Zakaria Hossain, 2025.
"Assessing the Impact of Rice Husk Ash on Soil Strength in Subgrade Layers: A Novel Approach to Sustainable Ground Engineering,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-24, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5457-:d:1678352
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5457-:d:1678352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.