IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5038-d1668579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping Soil Erosion Potential in Algeria’s Wadi Mina Basin: Insights from Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation and Geographic Information System for Sustainable Land Management

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Achite

    (Water and Environment Laboratory, Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Chlef 02180, Algeria
    Georesources, Environment and Natural Risks Laboratory, University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed, Oran 31000, Algeria)

  • Pandurang Choudhari

    (Department of Geography, University of Mumbai, Mumbai 400032, India)

  • Abderrezak Kamel Toubal

    (Water and Environment Laboratory, Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Chlef 02180, Algeria)

  • Tommaso Caloiero

    (National Research Council of Italy, Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection (CNR-IRPI), 87036 Rende, Italy)

  • Alessandra De Marco

    (National Research Council of Italy, Territorial Research Area of Cosenza, 87036 Rende, Italy)

  • Sylvain Ouillon

    (Laboratory of Space Geophysical and Oceanographic Studies (LEGOS), CNES, CNRS, IRD, UT3, University of Toulouse, 31013 Toulouse, France
    Department of Water—Environment—Oceanography, University of Science and Technology of Hanoi, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

Abstract

In this paper, the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model has been employed as a critical analytical instrument to assess the likelihood of soil erosion and pinpoint the most appropriate locations for conservation initiatives in the Wadi Mina basin (Algeria). The compilation of thematic maps was accomplished through the integration of the Spatial Analyst module in ArcGIS, resulting in a comprehensive map depicting potential erosion. This process incorporated rainfall data collected over a four-decade period from 1971 to 2010. The findings of this study demonstrate that the intensity of soil erosion and the generation of sediment are influenced by the topographical characteristics of the region, and the steepness of the terrain. Soil erosion within the Wadi Mina basin presents notable fluctuations, spanning a spectrum from a low of 0 to a high of 772.16 tons per hectare annually, with the mean annual erosion rate calculated at 16.69 tons per hectare. The Sediment Delivery Ratio (SDR) for the basin is estimated to be around 19.20%. Understanding soil erosion patterns at different sub-basin levels can be valuable for designing effective conservation strategies. This information helps to implement erosion control measures and to improve overall environmental management within the basin.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Achite & Pandurang Choudhari & Abderrezak Kamel Toubal & Tommaso Caloiero & Alessandra De Marco & Sylvain Ouillon, 2025. "Mapping Soil Erosion Potential in Algeria’s Wadi Mina Basin: Insights from Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation and Geographic Information System for Sustainable Land Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5038-:d:1668579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Chowdary & D. Chakraborthy & A. Jeyaram & Y. Murthy & J. Sharma & V. Dadhwal, 2013. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Watershed Prioritization Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique and GIS," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(10), pages 3555-3571, August.
    2. R. Jaiswal & T. Thomas & R. Galkate & N. Ghosh & S. Singh, 2014. "Watershed Prioritization Using Saaty’s AHP Based Decision Support for Soil Conservation Measures," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(2), pages 475-494, January.
    3. Randhir, Timothy & Shriver, Deborah M., 2009. "Deliberative valuation without prices: A multiattribute prioritization for watershed ecosystem management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 3042-3051, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E. Molina-Navarro & S. Martínez-Pérez & A. Sastre-Merlín & R. Bienes-Allas, 2014. "Catchment Erosion and Sediment Delivery in a Limno-Reservoir Basin Using a Simple Methodology," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(8), pages 2129-2143, June.
    2. Omid Rahmati & Ali Haghizadeh & Stefanos Stefanidis, 2016. "Assessing the Accuracy of GIS-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process for Watershed Prioritization; Gorganrood River Basin, Iran," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(3), pages 1131-1150, February.
    3. S. L. Razavi Toosi & J. M. V. Samani, 2017. "Prioritizing Watersheds Using a Novel Hybrid Decision Model Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy VIKOR," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2853-2867, July.
    4. R. Jaiswal & Narayan Ghosh & A. Lohani & T. Thomas, 2015. "Fuzzy AHP Based Multi Crteria Decision Support for Watershed Prioritization," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(12), pages 4205-4227, September.
    5. S. Razavi Toosi & J. Samani, 2014. "A New Integrated MADM Technique Combined with ANP, FTOPSIS and Fuzzy Max-Min Set Method for Evaluating Water Transfer Projects," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(12), pages 4257-4272, September.
    6. R. Jaiswal & T. Thomas & R. Galkate & N. Ghosh & S. Singh, 2014. "Watershed Prioritization Using Saaty’s AHP Based Decision Support for Soil Conservation Measures," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(2), pages 475-494, January.
    7. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Pascual Fernández Martínez & Amelia Pérez Zabaleta & João C. Azevedo, 2021. "Dealing with Water Conflicts: A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Approaches to Manage Freshwater Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    8. Kun Cheng & Qiang Fu & Xi Chen & Tianxiao Li & Qiuxiang Jiang & Xiaosong Ma & Ke Zhao, 2015. "Adaptive Allocation Modeling for a Complex System of Regional Water and Land Resources Based on Information Entropy and its Application," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(14), pages 4977-4993, November.
    9. Arash Malekian & Ali Azarnivand, 2016. "Application of Integrated Shannon’s Entropy and VIKOR Techniques in Prioritization of Flood Risk in the Shemshak Watershed, Iran," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 409-425, January.
    10. Peck, Megan & Khirfan, Luna, 2021. "Improving the validity and credibility of the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services in Amman, Jordan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Aihua Wei & Duo Li & Yahong Zhou & Qinghai Deng & Liangdong Yan, 2021. "A novel combination approach for karst collapse susceptibility assessment using the analytic hierarchy process, catastrophe, and entropy model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 405-430, January.
    12. Mariam Maki Sy & Charles Figuières & Hélène Rey-Valette & Richard B. Howarth & Rutger Wit, 2024. "Valuation of ecosystem services and social choice: the impact of deliberation in the context of two different aggregation rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 63(3), pages 619-640, November.
    13. Motilal Ghimire & Niroj Timalsina & Wei Zhao, 2024. "A Geographical approach of watershed prioritization in the Himalayas: a case study in the middle mountain district of Nepal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23527-23560, September.
    14. Meinard, Yves & Remy, Alice & Schmid, Bernhard, 2017. "Measuring Impartial Preference for Biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 45-54.
    15. A. Alvarado & M. Esteller & E. Quentin & J. Expósito, 2016. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and GIS Approach for Prioritization of Drinking Water Utilities Protection Based on their Vulnerability to Contamination," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1549-1566, March.
    16. Pelletier, Nathan, 2010. "Environmental sustainability as the first principle of distributive justice: Towards an ecological communitarian normative foundation for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1887-1894, August.
    17. Seyed Kamal Ghoreishi Gharehtikan & Saeid Gharechelou & Emad Mahjoobi & Saeed Golian & Fatemeh Rafiei & Hossein Salehi, 2024. "Surface Water Resources Planning in an Ungauged Transboundary Basin Using Satellite Products and the AHP Method," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Elias Rodrigues Cunha & Vitor Matheus Bacani & Elói Panachuki, 2017. "Modeling soil erosion using RUSLE and GIS in a watershed occupied by rural settlement in the Brazilian Cerrado," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 851-868, January.
    19. Yuyang Mao & Yu Li & Xinlu Bai & Xiaolu Yang & Youting Han & Xin Fu, 2024. "Scenario-Based Green Infrastructure Installations for Building Urban Stormwater Resilience—A Case Study of Fengxi New City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    20. A. Alvarado & M. V. Esteller & E. Quentin & J. L. Expósito, 2016. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and GIS Approach for Prioritization of Drinking Water Utilities Protection Based on their Vulnerability to Contamination," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1549-1566, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5038-:d:1668579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.