Author
Listed:
- Zhihua Luo
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, 230 Outer Ring West Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Wangning Mu
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, 230 Outer Ring West Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Yingzhi Liang
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, 230 Outer Ring West Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Zhihui Xiao
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, 230 Outer Ring West Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Zhiqiang Zhou
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, 230 Outer Ring West Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Yuankui Li
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, 230 Outer Ring West Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China)
Abstract
Enclosed courtyards with partially ground floor pilotis represent a prevalent architectural spatial configuration in hot-humid regions, where the shaded outdoor areas serve as frequently utilized spaces for heat avoidance and rest. This study employed a combined approach of ENVI-met simulations and field measurements to investigate the wind and thermal environment in the shaded areas of courtyards under 40 different pilotis width configurations. The Comfortable Wind Zone Ratio (CWZR) and Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) were used as primary evaluation metrics to systematically investigate the influence of varying inlet/outlet width ratios in building pilotis on the wind-thermal environment within courtyard-shaded zones. The results demonstrate that: (1) Under a fixed outlet size, enlarging the inlet significantly enhances the CWZR in the shaded area, with a 28.66% difference observed between inlet sizes of L/4 and L. In contrast, under a fixed inlet size, expanding the outlet has a negligible effect on CWZR improvement. (2) Under a fixed outlet size, increasing the inlet width substantially reduces PET in the shaded zone, showing a 2.46 °C difference between inlet sizes of L/4 and L. Conversely, under a fixed inlet size, widening the outlet has a minimal impact on PET reduction. (3) A negative correlation exists between CWZR and PET in the shaded area, indicating that an increase in CWZR leads to a decrease in PET values. The findings provide bioclimatically quantified guidelines for the spatial design of courtyard pilotis in hot-humid regions, offering practical insights for optimizing thermal comfort in shaded outdoor environments.
Suggested Citation
Zhihua Luo & Wangning Mu & Yingzhi Liang & Zhihui Xiao & Zhiqiang Zhou & Yuankui Li, 2025.
"Impact of the Pilotis Ratio on the Summer Wind and Thermal Environment in Shaded Areas of Enclosed Courtyards in Hot and Humid Regions,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4689-:d:1659818
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4689-:d:1659818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.