IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4535-d1656883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A State-Specific Approach for Visualizing Overburdened Communities: Lessons from the Connecticut Environmental Justice Screening Tool 2.0

Author

Listed:
  • Yaprak Onat

    (Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340, USA)

  • Mary Buchanan

    (Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340, USA)

  • Libbie Duskin

    (Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340, USA)

  • Caterina Massidda

    (Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency, Cranston, RI 02920, USA)

  • James O’Donnell

    (Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340, USA
    Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340, USA)

Abstract

While multiple federal screening tools have previously been developed for mapping communities facing environmental injustice and health disparities, many states across the United States have seen value in developing state-specific screening tools. This article provides an overview of a recent addition to the list of state screening tools, the Connecticut Environmental Justice Screening Tool (CT EJScreen). CT EJScreen identifies communities disproportionately affected by environmental and socioeconomic burdens at the census tract level. The tool integrates geospatial data on potential pollution sources, exposures, health sensitivities, and socioeconomic factors to produce a cumulative Environmental Justice Index. This article describes the development process of the tool, its methodological framework, the multi-pronged public engagement during the development process, preliminary correlation analyses, lessons learned, and recommendations for future iterations. Spearman correlation and Principal Component Analysis were applied to assess variable relationships and guide indicator refinement. Stakeholder engagement with Connecticut’s environmental justice communities ensured that the tool reflects both quantitative data and lived experiences. CT EJScreen provides important information for policy implementation covering areas such as funding, public health issues, and permitting. The CT EJScreen process might serve as a useful template for other states looking to devise state-specific adjunct screening systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaprak Onat & Mary Buchanan & Libbie Duskin & Caterina Massidda & James O’Donnell, 2025. "A State-Specific Approach for Visualizing Overburdened Communities: Lessons from the Connecticut Environmental Justice Screening Tool 2.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4535-:d:1656883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4535/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4535/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther Min & Deric Gruen & Debolina Banerjee & Tina Echeverria & Lauren Freelander & Michael Schmeltz & Erik Saganić & Millie Piazza & Vanessa E. Galaviz & Michael Yost & Edmund Y.W. Seto, 2019. "The Washington State Environmental Health Disparities Map: Development of a Community-Responsive Cumulative Impacts Assessment Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Thomas M. Brody & Paisly Di Bianca & Jan Krysa, 2012. "Analysis of Inland Crude Oil Spill Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Emergency Response in the Midwest United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(10), pages 1741-1749, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heather Lochotzki & Karen Patricia Williams & Cynthia G. Colen & Olorunfemi Adetona & Charleta B. Tavares & Georgina M. Ginn & Rejeana Haynes & Wansoo Im & Tanya Bils & Darryl B. Hood, 2022. "A Framework for Interfacing and Partnering with Environmental Justice Communities as a Prelude to Human Health and Hazard Identification in the Vulnerable Census Tracts of Columbus, Ohio," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Sheehan Tim & Min Esther & Hess Jeremy, 2023. "A Comparison of Hazard Vulnerability Indexes for Washington State," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 59-74.
    3. Monika M. Derrien & Christopher Zuidema & Sarah Jovan & Amanda Bidwell & Weston Brinkley & Paulina López & Roseann Barnhill & Dale J. Blahna, 2020. "Toward Environmental Justice in Civic Science: Youth Performance and Experience Measuring Air Pollution Using Moss as a Bio-Indicator in Industrial-Adjacent Neighborhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Esther Min & Deric Gruen & Debolina Banerjee & Tina Echeverria & Lauren Freelander & Michael Schmeltz & Erik Saganić & Millie Piazza & Vanessa E. Galaviz & Michael Yost & Edmund Y.W. Seto, 2019. "The Washington State Environmental Health Disparities Map: Development of a Community-Responsive Cumulative Impacts Assessment Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Jianfeng Lu & Xiaoxia Wang & Jiahong Zhao, 2021. "Optimization of Emergency Supplies Scheduling for Hazardous Chemicals Storage Considering Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Stephanie M. Pusker & Kelly A. DeBie & Maggie L. Clark & Andreas M. Neophytou & Kayleigh P. Keller & Margaret J. Gutilla & David Rojas-Rueda, 2024. "Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development: Cumulative Environmental Exposures and All-Cause Mortality in Colorado Counties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-11, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4535-:d:1656883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.