IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3695-d1385110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Evaluation of Gypsum-Based Plasters with Pistachio Shells for Eco-Sustainable Building

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Fernandez

    (Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
    Istituto Euro-Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia, 90143 Palermo, Italy)

  • Maria Grazia Insinga

    (Istituto Euro-Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia, 90143 Palermo, Italy)

  • Roberta Basile

    (Istituto Euro-Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia, 90143 Palermo, Italy)

  • Federica Zagarella

    (Istituto Euro-Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia, 90143 Palermo, Italy)

  • Roberta Montagno

    (Istituto Euro-Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia, 90143 Palermo, Italy)

  • Maria Luisa Germanà

    (Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

Agri-food waste represents a serious problem that can be overcome by converting it into added-value material for the production of plasters for green building; in fact, it can be used as a reinforcement additive in the building material industry. In this study, the performance of gypsum-based plasters with pistachio shell additives was evaluated. Before being used as additives for gypsum-based plasters, pistachio shells were ground at three different grain sizes in order to verify how grain size influences the performance of the material. Tests were then carried out on all the produced mortars to evaluate their chemical and physical characteristics, and interesting results regarding the mechanical resistance of some of the produced materials were obtained. The results showed that the addition of pistachio shells improved mechanical performance in all cases and that the best mechanical performance and water absorption by capillarity were achieved with the 0.5–2 mm pistachio grain size, while the best thermal conductivity was achieved with the 2–4 mm grain size. Summarizing, the best results were obtained with a pistachio shell granulometry of 0.5–2 mm, sand, and a water/gypsum ratio of 0.86–0.74.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Fernandez & Maria Grazia Insinga & Roberta Basile & Federica Zagarella & Roberta Montagno & Maria Luisa Germanà, 2024. "Comparative Evaluation of Gypsum-Based Plasters with Pistachio Shells for Eco-Sustainable Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3695-:d:1385110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3695/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3695/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3695-:d:1385110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.