IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7452-d1726725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Waste Brick as Partial Replacement of Gypsum in Mortars: Mechanical Performance and Environmental Benefits for Sustainable Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Said Beldjilali

    (Department of Architecture, University Abdelhamid Ibn Badis of Mostaganem, Mostaganem 27000, Algeria)

  • Antonella Sarcinella

    (Innovation Engineering Department, University of Salento, Prov. le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Mohamed Amine Ouared

    (Laboratory of Structures, Geotechnics and Risks, University of Chlef, Chlef 02000, Algeria)

  • Abdelkader Bougara

    (Laboratory of Structures, Geotechnics and Risks, University of Chlef, Chlef 02000, Algeria)

  • Khalil Naciri

    (National Higher School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Moulay Ismail University, Marjane 2, Al Mansour, Meknes P.O. Box 15290, Morocco)

  • Rodica-Mariana Ion

    (National Institute of R&D for Chemistry and Petrochemistry (ICECHIM), 202 Splaiul Independentei, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
    Doctoral School of Materials Engineering Department, University Valahia of Targoviste, 13, Aleea Sinaia, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

Abstract

Replacing virgin raw materials with recycled waste in construction products is a key strategy for advancing sustainable development. This study explores the partial substitution of commercial gypsum with powdered waste brick (WB) in gypsum mortars, assessing its impact on mechanical performance, water absorption, and environmental footprint. Mortars were prepared with 0%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30% WB by weight. Results indicate that a 20% replacement level enhances flexural strength by 56% and compressive strength by 33% at 28 days, compared to the reference mix. SEM and XRD analyses revealed no formation of new crystalline phases, suggesting that the performance improvement is primarily due to physical interactions and microstructural effects. However, at 30% WB, a significant reduction in adhesion strength was observed, falling below the typical threshold for gypsum-based coatings, which may constrain practical application at higher replacement levels. Environmental assessment showed that both CO 2 emissions and energy consumption decreased by up to 20% with a 30% substitution. A 20% WB content is therefore proposed as the optimal compromise between mechanical performance and environmental benefit. This approach supports circular economy principles by promoting the reuse of ceramic construction waste in the development of new sustainable materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Said Beldjilali & Antonella Sarcinella & Mohamed Amine Ouared & Abdelkader Bougara & Khalil Naciri & Rodica-Mariana Ion, 2025. "Waste Brick as Partial Replacement of Gypsum in Mortars: Mechanical Performance and Environmental Benefits for Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7452-:d:1726725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7452/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7452/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7452-:d:1726725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.